Dynamic and static views of succession: Testing the descriptive power of the chronosequence approach

被引:269
作者
Foster, BL [1 ]
Tilman, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
基金
美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
chronosequence; chronosequence re-sampling; old-field succession; permanent plots; species richness; succession rate;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009895103017
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Chronosequence and permanent plot studies are the two most common methods for evaluating successional dynamics in plant communities. We combined these two approaches by re-sampling an old-field chronosequence at Cedar Creek Natural History Area (Minnesota, USA) to: (1) measure rates of secondary succession; and (2) to test the ability of the chronosequence approach to predict actual successional dynamics over a 14-year survey interval. For each of 19 chronosequence fields we calculated four complimentary indices of succession rate for community changes that actually occurred within each of these fields between 1983 and 1997. We found that measures of compositional dissimilarity, species turnover, and the change rates of perennial and native species cover over this 14-year period were all negatively correlated with field age, indicating that the rate of successional change in these old-fields generally declines over time. We also found that data collected from the initial static chronosequence survey (1983) accurately predicted many of the observed changes in species abundance that occurred between 1983 and 1997, but was a poor predictor of changes in species richness. In general, chronosequence re-sampling confirmed the validity of using the chronosequence approach to infer basic patterns of successional change.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BOTGAZ
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, LONG TERM STUDIES EC
[3]   Why do we need permanent plots in the study of long-term vegetation dynamics? [J].
Bakker, JP ;
Olff, H ;
Willems, JH ;
Zobel, M .
JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 1996, 7 (02) :147-155
[4]   PHYSIOLOGICAL ECOLOGY OF PLANT SUCCESSION [J].
BAZZAZ, FA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1979, 10 :351-371
[5]  
BONIKAMM R, 1981, VEGETATIO, V47, P213
[6]   NONPARAMETRIC MULTIVARIATE ANALYSES OF CHANGES IN COMMUNITY STRUCTURE [J].
CLARKE, KR .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1993, 18 (01) :117-143
[7]   SUCCESSION IN GRASSLANDS - 32 YEARS OF CHANGE IN A CENTRAL OKLAHOMA TALLGRASS PRAIRIE [J].
COLLINS, SL ;
ADAMS, DE .
VEGETATIO, 1983, 51 (03) :181-190
[8]  
COOPER WILLIAM S., 1926, ECOLOGY, V7, P391, DOI 10.2307/1931166
[9]   Changes in Mediterranean plant succession: Old-fields revisited [J].
Debussche, M ;
Escarre, J ;
Lepart, J ;
Houssard, C ;
Lavorel, S .
JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 1996, 7 (04) :519-526
[10]   COMPOSITIONAL DISSIMILARITY AS A ROBUST MEASURE OF ECOLOGICAL DISTANCE [J].
FAITH, DP ;
MINCHIN, PR ;
BELBIN, L .
VEGETATIO, 1987, 69 (1-3) :57-68