Evaluating agri-environmental indicators (AEIs) -: Use and limitations of international indicators at national level

被引:56
作者
Yli-Viikari, Anja [1 ]
Hietala-Koivu, Reija
Huusela-Veistola, Erja
Hyvonen, Terho
Perala, Paula
Turtola, Eila
机构
[1] MTT, Agrifood Res Finland, FIN-31600 Jokioinen, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Appl Biol, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
decision-making; agricultural nutrient loading; landscape; species diversity; pesticide use; agricultural greenhouse gas emissions;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.11.005
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The assessment of agricultural performance in the last decades has been forced to move away from a single criterion of productivity towards broader viewpoints. This article focuses on the feasibility of agri-environmental indicators that are aimed to be used for international comparisons. Indicators of two widely known international organizations, OECD and the Commission of European Communities, were evaluated from the viewpoint of national case study. There exist already plenty of methodology to describe agri-environmental development, which mean that future decision-makers will be better informed about the changes of agricultural systems. Data sets are, however, heterogeneous, which needs be carefully acknowledged by the users. Moreover, characteristic feature of agri-environmental indicators is, that they are producing information in a given problem structuring. Therefore, they are unable to recognize the specific properties of each case study. They are providing relevant statistics, but are still missing for the framework, which would open the meaning of numbers and show the relevance of notices within the particular case study. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 163
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
AAKKULA JJ, 1999, AGR EC RES I PUBLICA
[2]  
[Anonymous], EVALUATION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, GOOD PRACTICE GUIDAN
[4]  
[Anonymous], THEM GUID INT ASS MO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[6]   Publicly-funded UK agricultural R&D and 'social' total factor productivity [J].
Barnes, AP .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 27 (01) :65-74
[7]  
BINDER C, 2001, IN C IND EC NETH 12
[8]  
*CEC, 1999, AGR ENV RUR DEV FACT
[9]  
*CEC, 2001, STAT INF NEED IND MO
[10]  
*CEC, 2000, 20 COM CEC