Survey of public information about ongoing clinical trials funded by industry: evaluation of completeness and accessibility

被引:33
作者
Manheimer, E [1 ]
Anderson, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Ctr Clin Trials & Evidence Based Healthcare, Providence, RI 02912 USA
来源
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2002年 / 325卷 / 7363期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.325.7363.528
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the completeness and accessibility of public information about US clinical trials of drugs in development. Design Review of online registers of clinical trials. Data sources Drugs in phase Ell trials were identified using three drug industry sources: PhRMA Survey, What's in the Pipeline, and the NDA Pipeline. Drug trials were then searched for on the following publicly accessible registers of clinical trials: CancerNet.gov, CenterWatch.com, ClinicalTrials.gov, and registers associated with the 37 "Comprehensive Cancer Centers" designated by the National Cancer Institute. Main outcome measure Extent of availability of public information on phase III trials of drugs in development for treating either prostate or colon cancer. Results Search of industry sources identified 12 drugs for prostate cancer and 20 for colon cancer undergoing phase III trials. The most comprehensive publicly available register, ClinicalTrials.gov, contained trial listings for only seven of the prostate cancer drugs and 10 of the colon cancer drugs. Trials of three prostate cancer and three colon cancer drugs were listed on only one register each. A substantial proportion of trials of prostate cancer drugs (3/12) and colon cancer drugs (8/20) were not associated with trial listings in any registers. Conclusions Existing trials registers are unlikely to be meeting user needs since many ongoing drug trials are not listed. There is a clear need for a comprehensive clinical trials register encompassing all ongoing trials, including industry sponsored trials.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 531
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
*AM SOC CLIN ONC, ASCO SURV PHARM IND
[2]  
Anderson D., 2001, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V22, p40S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470693926.CH24
[4]  
Davey-Smith G., 2008, SYSTEMATIC REV HLTH
[5]  
*DEP HLTH RES DEV, RES GOV FRAM
[6]   The Cochrane Collaboration: Evaluation of health care and services using systematic reviews of the results of randomized controlled trials [J].
Dickersin, K ;
Manheimer, E .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 41 (02) :315-331
[7]   Development of the Cochrane Collaboration's CENTRAL register of controlled clinical trials [J].
Dickersin, K ;
Manheimer, E ;
Wieland, S ;
Robinson, KA ;
Lefebvre, C ;
McDonald, SD .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2002, 25 (01) :38-64
[8]  
HETHERINGTON J, 1989, PEDIATRICS, V84, P374
[9]   Time to register randomised trials - The case is now unanswerable [J].
Horton, R ;
Smith, R .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7214) :865-866
[10]   Better access to information about clinical trials [J].
McCray, AT .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 133 (08) :609-614