Comparative case study of life usage and data-driven prognostics techniques using aircraft fault messages

被引:18
作者
Baptista, Marcia [1 ]
de Medeiros, Ivo P. [2 ]
Malere, Joao P. [2 ]
Nascimento, Cairo, Jr. [3 ]
Prendinger, Helmut [4 ]
Henriques, Elsa M. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Embraer SA, Dev Technol Dept, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
[3] ITA, BR-12228900 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
[4] Natl Inst Informat, Chiyoda Ku, 2-1-2 Hitotsubashi, Tokyo 1018430, Japan
关键词
Case study; Aircraft prognostics; Data-driven techniques; Life usage modeling; Fault messages; GAUSSIAN PROCESS; MODEL; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compind.2016.12.008
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
080201 [机械制造及其自动化];
摘要
Prognostics are a key activity in repair and maintenance operations. A recent approach to condition-based maintenance is the data-driven approach. This approach has been mostly based on past failure time measures, and sensed measurements of component degradation to derive estimates of the remaining useful life of equipment. An alternative source of data, rarely used in these models, is the stream of automatic messages derived from diagnostics systems, which consist of fault codes indicating abnormal events or deviations from optimal operation. Despite the richness and concise nature of these messages, their difficult interpretation poses significant challenges to its use in prognostics. This paper aims to show that data-driven prognostics based on this type of messages can be better suited to maintenance than time-based approaches. We illustrate this comparison with an industrial case study involving the removal times of a bleed valve from the aircraft air management system. Our experimental results reveal a significant accuracy improvement over the contrasting time-based models. We also establish the contribution to this improvement of the data-driven methods and message-related predictors. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]
NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[2]
Practical options for selecting data-driven or physics-based prognostics algorithms with reviews [J].
An, Dawn ;
Kim, Nam H. ;
Choi, Joo-Ho .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 133 :223-236
[3]
[Anonymous], 2005, Fault-Diagnosis Systems: An Introduction from Fault Detection to Fault Tolerance
[4]
[Anonymous], 2007, AAAI FALL S
[5]
[Anonymous], 2004, SYSTEM RELIABILITY T
[6]
A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection [J].
Arlot, Sylvain ;
Celisse, Alain .
STATISTICS SURVEYS, 2010, 4 :40-79
[7]
Remaining useful life in theory and practice [J].
Banjevic, Dragan .
METRIKA, 2009, 69 (2-3) :337-349
[8]
Gaussian process for nonstationary time series prediction [J].
Brahim-Belhouari, S ;
Bermak, A .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2004, 47 (04) :705-712
[9]
Cullen A., 1999, Probabilistic Techniques in Exposure Assessment. A Handbook for Dealing with Variability and Uncertainty in Models and Inputs
[10]
E. A. Strong, 2014, DEV METHOD INCORPORA