MR angiography of the intracranial venous system

被引:82
作者
Liauw, L
van Buchem, MA
Spilt, A
de Bruïne, FT
van den Berg, R
Hermans, J
Wasser, MNJM
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Stat, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
cerebral blood vessels; MR; magnetic resonance (MR); angiography; comparative studies; maximum intensity projection; phase imaging; three-dimensional; time of flight;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.214.3.r00mr41678
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of different imaging planes at time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and phase-contrast MR angiography in the visualization of the normal intracranial venous system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 12 healthy volunteers, two-dimensional (2D) TOF MR angiography and three-dimensional (3D) phase-contrast MR angiography were performed in transverse, sagittal, and coronal planes. All data were displayed as maximum intensity projection (MIP) images. Four neuroradiologists assessed the visibility of 28 intracranial venous structures on the MIP images. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Friedman two-way analysis of variance and the Cochran Q test. RESULTS: Visualization of the normal intracranial venous system was better with 3D phase-contrast and coronal 2D TOF MR angiography than with transverse or sagittal 2D TOF MR angiography (P < .05, Friedman test) for each observer and the group of observers. Differences were found between each of the 2D TOF and 3D phase-contrast MR angiographic sequences in the visualization of individual venous structures (Cochran Q test). The kappa values ranged from 0.36 to 0.71, which indicated a moderate to good agreement between observers. CONCLUSION: The normal intracranial venous system is adequately visualized with 3D phase-contrast and coronal 2D TOF MR angiography.
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 682
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   NORMAL AND VARIANT ANATOMY OF THE DURAL VENOUS SINUSES [J].
CURE, JK ;
VANTASSEL, P ;
SMITH, MT .
SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 1994, 15 (06) :499-519
[2]  
DORMONT D, 1995, AM J NEURORADIOL, V16, P1347
[3]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF THROMBOSED DURAL SINUSES [J].
ISENSEE, C ;
REUL, J ;
THRON, A .
STROKE, 1994, 25 (01) :29-34
[4]  
KOUWENHOVEN M, 1994, VASCULAR DIAGNOSTICS, P379
[5]  
LEWIN JS, 1994, AM J NEURORADIOL, V15, P1657
[6]   CEREBRAL VENOGRAPHY WITH MR [J].
MATTLE, HP ;
WENTZ, KU ;
EDELMAN, RR ;
WALLNER, B ;
FINN, JP ;
BARNES, P ;
ATKINSON, DJ ;
KLEEFIELD, J ;
HOOGEWOUD, HM .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (02) :453-458
[7]   CHILDREN WITH CEREBRAL VENOUS THROMBOSIS DIAGNOSED WITH MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
MEDLOCK, MD ;
OLIVERO, WC ;
HANIGAN, WC ;
WRIGHT, RM ;
WINEK, SJ ;
SCOTT, RM ;
MICKLE, JP .
NEUROSURGERY, 1992, 31 (05) :870-876
[8]  
PERL J, 1996, MAGNETIC RESONANCE I, P1548
[9]  
RIPPE DJ, 1990, AM J NEURORADIOL, V11, P199
[10]  
TSURUDA JS, 1991, AM J NEURORADIOL, V12, P481