Fertilization with a new type of coated urea: Evaluation for nitrogen efficiency and yield in winter wheat

被引:40
作者
Fan, XL [1 ]
Li, FM
Liu, F
Kumar, D
机构
[1] S China Agr Univ, Coll Nat Resources & Environm, Dept Plant Nutr, Res Lab Fertilizer & Balanced Fertilizat, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China
[2] Indian Grassland & Fodder Res Inst, Jhansi 284003, Uttar Pradesh, India
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
winter wheat; yield; coated urea; nitrogen uptake; nitrogen efficiency;
D O I
10.1081/PLN-120030675
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Three years field experiments were conducted from 1999 to 2002 to evaluate winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield, nitrogen efficiency (NE) including nitrogen efficiency ratio (NER), nitrogen uptake efficiency (NUpE), nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency (Nf UE) Lis influenced by a new coated urea as CRF. Results showed that both coated urea and common urea treatments produced significant higher biomass, grain, and straw yields, and higher NUE and nitrogen fertilizer recovery rate over the control. The maximum yield and nitrogen (N) efficiency were observed in the treatment of coated urea in the three years. On average, the grain, straw, and biomass yield of coated urea treatment was 9.09-15.06, 13.11-14.96, and 11.73-14.99% higher than those of common urea respectively. The coated urea not only resulted in higher yield, but nitrogen fertilizer recovery rate (Nf UE) of the treatment was 16.50-68.72% more than that of common urea treatment. Compared to normal dosage of N fertilization (150 kg N ha(-1)) insufficient amount increase of N fertilizer (8% increase) does not affect both yield and NE. However, sufficient amount increase of N fertilizer (20% higher) can result in significant increase of yield, N uptake and N fertilizer recovery rate (Nf UE) under the experiment condition.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 865
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Effects of 4-amino 1,2,4 triazole, dicyandiamide and encapsulated calcium carbide on nitrification inhibition in a subtropical soil under upland and flooded conditions [J].
Aulakh, MS ;
Kuldip-Singh ;
Doran, J .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 2001, 33 (03) :258-263
[2]  
Bock B.R., 1984, NITROGEN CROP PRODUC, P273, DOI DOI 10.2134/1990.NITROGENINCROPPRODUCTION.C18
[3]  
Bremner JM, 1982, AGRONOMY, P595
[4]  
Fan X.L., 2001, J NW SCI TECH U AGR, V29, P29, DOI [10.3321/j., DOI 10.3321/J]
[5]   ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF FACTORS WHICH CONTRIBUTE TO EFFICIENCY OF NITROGEN-UTILIZATION [J].
MOLL, RH ;
KAMPRATH, EJ ;
JACKSON, WA .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1982, 74 (03) :562-564
[6]   FATE OF LABELED NITROGEN-FERTILIZER APPLIED TO WINTER-WHEAT FOR 5 YEARS [J].
OLSON, RV ;
SWALLOW, CW .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1984, 48 (03) :583-586
[7]  
PRASAD R., 1971, Advances in Agronomy, V23, P337, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60156-X
[8]   NITRIFICATION INHIBITORS FOR AGRICULTURE, HEALTH, AND THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
PRASAD, R ;
POWER, JF .
ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 54, 1995, 54 :233-281
[9]   Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production [J].
Raun, WR ;
Johnson, GV .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1999, 91 (03) :357-363
[10]   CONTROLLED-RELEASE FERTILIZERS TO INCREASE EFFICIENCY OF NUTRIENT USE AND MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION - A REVIEW [J].
SHAVIV, A ;
MIKKELSEN, RL .
FERTILIZER RESEARCH, 1993, 35 (1-2) :1-12