MRI of menisci repaired with bioabsorbable arrows

被引:12
作者
Mustonen, Antti O. T. [1 ]
Tielinen, Laura [1 ]
Lindahl, Jan [1 ]
Hirvensalo, Eero [1 ]
Kiuru, Martti [1 ]
Koskinen, Seppo K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Helsinki 00260, Finland
关键词
meniscus; bioabsorbable arrow; MR imaging; MR arthrography;
D O I
10.1007/s00256-006-0080-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To analyze with conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) the signal appearance of menisci repaired with bioabsorbable arrows. Design and patients: Forty-four patients with 47 meniscal tears treated with bioabsorbable arrows underwent follow-up conventional MRI examination. The time interval between the surgery and MRI varied from 5 to 67 months (mean 26 months). Twenty-six patients also had concurrent repair of torn anterior cruciate ligament. The following grades were used to classify meniscal signal intensity: (a) G0; low signal intensity on all sequences and regular configuration in every plane, (b) G1; increased signal intensity within the meniscus, not extending to the meniscal surface, (c) G2; increased signal intensity linear in shape, which may or may not communicate with the capsular margin of the meniscus, without extending to the meniscal surface, and (d) G3; increased signal intensity extending to the meniscal surface. Results: Thirteen menisci (27.5%) had normal signal intensity, 13 menisci (27.5%) Grade 1 signal intensity, 9 menisci (19%) Grade 2 signal intensity and 12 menisci (26%) Grade 3 signal intensity. The time difference between operation and MRI was statistically significant between the G0 (36 months) and G3 groups (14 months; P=0.0288). There was no statistical significance in different grades between medial and lateral meniscus or between patients with operated or intact ACL. On physical examination sixteen patients reported slight symptoms, seen evenly in each group. Conclusion: No difference was seen in different grades between patients with operated or intact ACL. The highest incidence of menisci with a Grade 3 signal was seen in patients where surgery was within the last 18 months.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 521
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
Albrecht-Olsen P, 1993, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, V1, P104, DOI 10.1007/BF01565462
[2]
Failure strength of a new meniscus arrow repair technique: Biomechanical comparison with horizontal suture [J].
AlbrechtOlsen, P ;
Lind, T ;
Kristensen, G ;
Falkenberg, B .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1997, 13 (02) :183-187
[3]
MR imaging of the meniscus [J].
Anderson, MW .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 40 (05) :1081-+
[4]
MAGNETIC-RESONANCE SIGNALS IN HEALING MENISCI - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY IN DOGS [J].
ARNOCZKY, SP ;
COOPER, TG ;
STADELMAIER, DM ;
HANNAFIN, JA .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1994, 10 (05) :552-557
[5]
COOPER DE, 1990, CLIN SPORT MED, V9, P589
[6]
MENISCECTOMY AND CHONDROMALACIA OF FEMORAL CONDYLE [J].
DANDY, DJ ;
JACKSON, RW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1975, 57 (08) :1116-1119
[7]
Davis Kirkland W, 2002, Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, V6, P35, DOI 10.1055/s-2002-23162
[8]
MR imaging and MR arthrography for diagnosis of recurrent tears in the postoperative meniscus [J].
De Smet, AA .
SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 9 (02) :116-124
[9]
PERIPHERAL MENISCAL TEARS - MR FINDINGS AFTER CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT OR ARTHROSCOPIC REPAIR [J].
DEUTSCH, AL ;
MINK, JH ;
FOX, JM ;
ARNOCZKY, SP ;
ROTHMAN, BJ ;
STOLLER, DW ;
CANNON, WD .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (02) :485-488
[10]
Clinical evaluation of meniscus repair with a bioabsorbable arrow: a 2-to 3-year follow-up study [J].
Ellermann, A ;
Siobold, R ;
Buelow, JU ;
Sobau, C .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2002, 10 (05) :289-293