Multiple paths of sugar-sensing and a sugar/oxygen overlap for genes of sucrose and ethanol metabolism

被引:95
作者
Koch, KE [1 ]
Ying, Z [1 ]
Wu, Y [1 ]
Avigne, WT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Hort Sci, Plant Mol & Cellular Biol Program, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
invertase; sucrose synthase; alcohol dehydrogenase; sugar-sensing;
D O I
10.1093/jexbot/51.suppl_1.417
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The two-fold purpose of this work is, first, to review current hypotheses for multiple paths of sugar-sensing in an oxygen-responsive context, and second, to present evidence for the extent of sugar/oxygen overlap regulating genes for sucrose and ethanol metabolism. Current data indicate that sugar signals in plants may be initiated by (a) hexokinases, (b) membrane sensors, (c) acetate and/or respiratory metabolites, and (d) other signals and/or crosstalk. Responses may also involve concurrent input along transduction paths by effecters such as energy charge, P status, and phytohormones. Prime candidates for initiation and/or integration of such signal integration include SNF1- and SOP-like, multi-enzyme complexes. In addition, different paths of sugar signal transduction may be linked to contrasting roles of responsive genes during feast, famine or pathogen attack. Oxygen can potentially alter sugar signals at several points, so its influence on feast and famine responses was initially tested with genes for sucrose metabolism in maize root tips. The Sus1 and Sh1 sucrose synthases in maize (typically up-regulated by carbohydrate abundance and deprivation, respectively) showed parallel responses to hypoxia (3% O-2 [0.031 l(-1) O-2]) and anoxia (0% O-2 [01 l(-1) O-s]) that were consistent with involvement of similar signals, In contrast, the differential sugar-responses of the Ivr1 and Ivr2 invertases were not evident under low oxygen, and both genes were rapidly repressed. A third response was evident in the marked, sugar-regulation of an oxygen-responsive Adh1 gene for alcohol dehydrogenase, which was sensitive to sugar availability from deficit to abundance, regardless of oxygen status (anaerobic to fully aerobic [40% O-2 (0.041 l(-1) O-2)]. A clear interface is thus evident between sugar and oxygen signals, but this varies markedly with the genes involved and probable differences in respective transduction paths.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 427
页数:11
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   GENETIC AND MOLECULAR APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF THE ANAEROBIC RESPONSE AND TISSUE SPECIFIC GENE-EXPRESSION IN MAIZE [J].
BAILEYSERRES, J ;
KLOECKENERGRUISSEM, B ;
FREELING, M .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1988, 11 (05) :351-357
[2]   Glucokinase mutations, insulin secretion, and diabetes mellitus [J].
Bell, GI ;
Pilkis, SJ ;
Weber, IT ;
Polonsky, KS .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 58 :171-+
[3]   Glycolytic flux and hexokinase activities in anoxic maize root tips acclimated by hypoxic pretreatment [J].
Bouny, JM ;
Saglio, PH .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 111 (01) :187-194
[4]   Sucrose is a signal molecule in assimilate partitioning [J].
Chiou, TJ ;
Bush, DR .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1998, 95 (08) :4784-4788
[5]  
DeWinde JH, 1996, EUR J BIOCHEM, V241, P633
[6]   QUANTIFICATION OF COMPARTMENTED METABOLIC FLUXES IN MAIZE ROOT-TIPS USING ISOTOPE DISTRIBUTION FROM C-13-LABELED OR C-14-LABELED GLUCOSE [J].
DIEUAIDENOUBHANI, M ;
RAFFARD, G ;
CANIONI, P ;
PRADET, A ;
RAYMOND, P .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 270 (22) :13147-13159
[7]   DIFFERENTIAL INTERACTIONS OF PROMOTER ELEMENTS IN STRESS RESPONSES OF THE ARABIDOPSIS ADH GENE [J].
DOLFERUS, R ;
JACOBS, M ;
PEACOCK, WJ ;
DENNIS, ES .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 105 (04) :1075-1087
[8]   Three spinach leaf nitrate reductase-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase kinases that are regulated by reversible phosphorylation and/or Ca2+ ions [J].
Douglas, P ;
Pigaglio, E ;
Ferrer, A ;
Halford, NG ;
MacKintosh, C .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 325 :101-109
[9]   Oxygen deficiency and root metabolism: Injury and acclimation under hypoxia and anoxia [J].
Drew, MC .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1997, 48 :223-250
[10]  
Ehness R, 1997, PLANT CELL, V9, P1825