Treatment of lymph-node-negative, oestrogen-recept-postive breast cancer: long-term findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomised clinical trials

被引:262
作者
Fisher, B
Jeong, JH
Bryant, J
Anderson, S
Dignam, J
Fisher, ER
Wolmark, N
机构
[1] Natl Surg Adjuvant Breast & Bowel Project, Operat Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Natl Surg Adjuvant Breast & Bowel Project, Ctr Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Natl Surg Adjuvant Breast & Bowel Project, Pathol Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16981-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-14 and B-20 trials showed that tamoxifen benefited women with oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours and negative axillary nodes, and that chemotherapy plus tamoxifen was more effective than tamoxifen alone. We present long-term findings from those trials and relate them to age, menopausal status, and tumour oestrogen-receptor concentrations. We also discuss the extent of progress made in the treatment of such patients. Methods B-14 patients were randomly assigned to placebo (n=1453) or tamoxifen (n=1439); B-20 patients to tamoxifen (n=788) or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, and tamoxifen (CMFT, n=789). Primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival and overall survival estimated according to patients' age, menopausal status, and tumour oestrogen-receptor concentration. Smoothed recurrence rates were used to measure patterns of recurrence as a continuous function of age. Findings Compared with placebo, tamoxifen benefited women in B-14 through 15 years, irrespective of age, menopausal status, or tumour oestrogen-receptor concentration (hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence-free survival 0.58, 95% CI 0.50-0.67, p<0.0001; HR for overall survival 0.80, 0.71-0.91, p=0.0008). In B-20, the benefit from CMFT over 12 years was greater than that from tamoxifen alone (HR for recurrence-free survival 0.52, 0.39-0.68, p<0.0001; HR for overall survival 0.78, 0.60-1.01, p=0.063). When CMFT was compared with placebo, there were reductions in treatment failure of about 65% in all age-groups. Interpretation Much benefit has been achieved in treatment of women with oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours and negative nodes. When planning systemic therapy for such patients of all ages, it should be understood that some have tumours with variable concentrations of oestrogen-receptors, a surrogate for other biomarkers associated with tumour growth and response to treatment. Older women tend to have higher tumour oestrogen-receptor concentrations and are more likely to benefit from tamoxifen than from chemotherapy; in younger women, the converse is true. Consequently, the notion that use of tamoxifen or chemotherapy should be based only on age is too restrictive.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 868
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Abe O, 1998, LANCET, V352, P930
[2]   COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY AS AN ADJUVANT TREATMENT IN OPERABLE BREAST-CANCER [J].
BONADONNA, G ;
BRUSAMOLINO, E ;
VALAGUSSA, P ;
ROSSI, A ;
BRUGNATELLI, L ;
BRAMBILLA, C ;
DELENA, M ;
TANCINI, G ;
BAJETTA, E ;
MUSUMECI, R ;
VERONESI, U .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1976, 294 (08) :405-410
[3]  
Bonetti M, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P2595, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20001015)19:19<2595::AID-SIM562>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-M
[5]   S-phase fraction combined with other patient and tumor characteristics for the prognosis of node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer [J].
Bryant, J ;
Fisher, B ;
Gündüz, N ;
Costantino, JP ;
Emir, B .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1998, 51 (03) :239-253
[6]  
CARBONE PP, 1977, ADV RES TREATMENT, P165
[7]   Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in combination with tamoxifen for node-positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients [J].
CastiglioneGertsch, M ;
Goldhirsch, A ;
Gusterson, B ;
Bettelheim, R ;
Reed, R ;
Gusset, H ;
Geiser, K ;
Hurny, C ;
Bernhard, J ;
Hangartner, A ;
Maibach, R ;
Pedowski, R ;
Gelber, R ;
Price, K ;
Peterson, H ;
Zelen, M ;
Isley, M ;
Hinkle, R ;
Kay, RG ;
Holdaway, IM ;
Harvey, VJ ;
Jagusch, MF ;
Neave, L ;
Mason, BM ;
Evans, B ;
Benjamin, CS ;
Carter, JF ;
Gillman, JC ;
Mack, D ;
BensonCooper, D ;
Monfardini, S ;
Galligioni, E ;
Crivellari, D ;
Buonadonna, A ;
Massarut, S ;
Rossi, C ;
Candiani, E ;
Carbone, A ;
Volpe, R ;
Trovo, MG ;
Roncadin, M ;
Santini, GF ;
Villalta, D ;
Coran, F ;
Morassut, S ;
Marini, G ;
Simoncini, E ;
Marpicati, P ;
Zaniboni, A ;
Sartori, U .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (04) :1385-1394
[8]  
Clarke M, 1998, LANCET, V351, P1451
[9]   LOCALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION - AN APPROACH TO REGRESSION-ANALYSIS BY LOCAL FITTING [J].
CLEVELAND, WS ;
DEVLIN, SJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 83 (403) :596-610
[10]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187