Reduction of cyclosporine after introduction of mycophenolate mofetil improves chronic renal dysfunction in heart transplant recipients -: The IMPROVED multi-centre study

Aims This comparative prospective multi-centre study evaluated efficacy and safety of cyclosporine A downtitration in heart transplant recipients with chronic renal dysfunction potentially attributable to cyclosporine (n = 161). Methods In the intervention arm (n = 109, recruited from 9 centres), mycophenolate mofetil was introduced de novo or substituting azathioprine, followed by cyclosporine reduction (target trough levels 2-4 mug/ml and 50 ng/ml, respectively). In controls (n = 52, recruited from 1 Centre), immunosuppression remained unchanged. Renal function was recorded twelve, six, and three months before, and throughout the eight-month study period. Results At study entry, cyclosporine trough levels and renal function parameters were comparable. At study end, mean SD cyclosporine in the intervention arm was 57 +/- 24 vs. 116 +/- 36 ng/ml in controls. During the study, creatinine decreased by 23.3 +/- 50.7 mumol/l (P < 0.0001) in the intervention arm but increased by 7.3 +/- 46.9 mumol/l (P = 0.992) in controls (P = 0.0001 for comparison between groups). A creatinine reduction of at least 20% was found in 35% of subjects of the intervention arm but only in 4% in the control arm (P < 0.0001 for comparison between groups). Improvement in renal function was not weakened after adjustment for baseline characteristics in multiple regression analysis. Renal function improved in strata of creatinine entry values from 150 to 310 mumol/l, regardless of the presence of diabetes. Myocardial biopsies at target levels for cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil showed three reversible subclinical rejection episodes. Conclusions Cyclosporine downtitration improved renal dysfunction in diabetic and non-diabetic heart transplant recipients across a wide range of creatinine levels. The long-term benefit of this strategy deserves further study. (C) 2004 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.