Performance analysis of support vector machines classifiers in breast cancer mammography recognition

被引:149
作者
Azar, Ahmad Taher [1 ]
El-Said, Shaimaa Ahmed [2 ]
机构
[1] MUST, Fac Engn, 6Th Of October City, Egypt
[2] Zagazig Univ, Elect & Commun Dept, Fac Engn, Zagazig, Sharkia, Egypt
关键词
Soft computing; Breast cancer diagnosis; Proximal support vector machine (PSVM); Lagrangian support vector machines (LSVM); Finite Newton method for Lagrangian support vector machine (NSVM); Linear programming support vector machines (LPSVM); Smooth support vector machine (SSVM); FEATURE-SELECTION; CLASSIFICATION RULES; NEWTON METHOD; DIAGNOSIS; NETWORKS; SYSTEMS; TUMORS; CURVE;
D O I
10.1007/s00521-012-1324-4
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
140502 [人工智能];
摘要
Support vector machine (SVM) is a supervised machine learning approach that was recognized as a statistical learning apotheosis for the small-sample database. SVM has shown its excellent learning and generalization ability and has been extensively employed in many areas. This paper presents a performance analysis of six types of SVMs for the diagnosis of the classical Wisconsin breast cancer problem from a statistical point of view. The classification performance of standard SVM (St-SVM) is analyzed and compared with those of the other modified classifiers such as proximal support vector machine (PSVM) classifiers, Lagrangian support vector machines (LSVM), finite Newton method for Lagrangian support vector machine (NSVM), Linear programming support vector machines (LPSVM), and smooth support vector machine (SSVM). The experimental results reveal that these SVM classifiers achieve very fast, simple, and efficient breast cancer diagnosis. The training results indicated that LSVM has the lowest accuracy of 95.6107 %, while St-SVM performed better than other methods for all performance indices (accuracy = 97.71 %) and is closely followed by LPSVM (accuracy = 97.3282). However, in the validation phase, the overall accuracies of LPSVM achieved 97.1429 %, which was superior to LSVM (95.4286 %), SSVM (96.5714 %), PSVM (96 %), NSVM (96.5714 %), and St-SVM (94.86 %). Value of ROC and MCC for LPSVM achieved 0.9938 and 0.9369, respectively, which outperformed other classifiers. The results strongly suggest that LPSVM can aid in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1177
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]
Supervised fuzzy clustering for the identification of fuzzy classifiers [J].
Abonyi, J ;
Szeifert, F .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2003, 24 (14) :2195-2207
[2]
Support vector machines combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis [J].
Akay, Mehmet Fatih .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (02) :3240-3247
[3]
[Anonymous], 2008, WORLD CANC REPORT
[4]
[Anonymous], 1999, The Nature Statist. Learn. Theory
[5]
[Anonymous], P KDD 2001 KNOWL DIS
[6]
[Anonymous], 1996, INT 96 P SYDN
[7]
[Anonymous], 1998, SUPPORT VECTOR MACHI
[8]
[Anonymous], PATTERN RECOGNITION
[9]
[Anonymous], 2003, PRACTICAL GUIDE SUPP
[10]
[Anonymous], 1997, MACHINE LEARNING, MCGRAW-HILL SCIENCE/ENGINEERING/MATH