Measuring accountability for results in interagency collaboratives

被引:77
作者
Page, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Daniel J Evans Sch Publ Affairs, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00406.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This article examines the intersection of two types of innovations that are increasingly common in public administration-accountability for results and interagency collaboration. Recent scholarship suggests four approaches that collaborators can use to increase their accountability for results. The article proposes measures of these four approaches to assess a collaborative's capacity for accountability, and uses them to compare the accountability of human services collaboratives in 10 states. The findings indicate that collaboratives; tend to use the four approaches together with one another In combination, the various approaches may help collaborators manage their stake holders' expectations about their actions and accomplishments. Further research is needed to determine whether a collaboratives capacity for accountability for results actually correlates with improvements in outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 606
页数:16
相关论文
共 67 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], DIMENSIONS SERVICES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, HDB PUBLIC ADM
[4]  
[Anonymous], COMMON PURPOSE
[5]  
[Anonymous], SYSTEMIC REFORM SERV
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ORG REPORT CARDS
[7]   Developmental dynamics: Interagency collaboration as an emergent phenomenon [J].
Bardach, E .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2001, 11 (02) :149-164
[8]  
Bardach E., 1996, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V6, P197, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JPART.A024307
[9]  
Bardach E., 1998, GETTING AGENCIES WOR
[10]  
BEHN R, 2001, 6 NAT PUBL MAN RES C