Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: What is the evidence?

被引:63
作者
Ballou, D [1 ]
Podgursky, M
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Columbia, MO USA
来源
TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD | 2000年 / 102卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/0161-4681.00046
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Using professional self-regulation in medicine as a model, the National Commission for Teaching and America's Future has proposed sweeping changes in the way teachers are trained-and licensed. The commission claims that these reforms are well-grounded in a strong base of research. However, a balanced reading of the literature finds far less support for these reforms than the commission has claimed. In many cases the research is misrepresented. Since the commission's proposals would transfer considerable regulatory power out of the public domain into private education organizations, the burden of proof is on the commission to make a convincing case that such changes promote the welfare of the public and not just the interest of the profession. This burden has not been met.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 27
页数:23
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
ARMOUTRHOMAS E, 1990, UNPUB OUTLIER STUDY
[2]  
BALLOU D, 1999, UNPUB NCATE TEACHERS
[3]  
BALLOU D, 1997, GOVT UNION REV, V14, P1
[4]  
Cohen D. K., 1998, CPRE Research Report Series RR-39
[5]  
DARLINGHAMMOND L, IN PRESS OPPORTUNITY
[6]  
FERGUSON RF, 1991, HARVARD J LEGIS, V28, P465
[7]  
FERGUSON RF, 1996, HOLDING SCH ACCOUNTA
[8]  
Greenwald R, 1996, REV EDUC RES, V66, P361, DOI 10.3102/00346543066003361
[9]  
Hanushek EA, 1996, REV EDUC RES, V66, P397, DOI 10.2307/1170529
[10]  
Hirsch E.D., 1996, The schools we need: And why we don't have them