Are Americans saving "optimally" for retirement?

被引:207
作者
Scholz, John Karl [1 ]
Seshadri, Ananth
Khitatrakun, Surachai
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Urban Inst, Washington, DC 20037 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/506335
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We solve each household's optimal saving decisions using a life cycle model that incorporates uncertain lifetimes, uninsurable earnings and medical expenses, progressive taxation, government transfers, and pension and social security benefits. With optimal decision rules, we compare, household by household, wealth predictions from the life cycle model using a nationally representative sample. We find, making use of household-specific earnings histories, that the model accounts for more than 80 percent of the 1992 cross-sectional variation in wealth. Fewer than 20 percent of households have less wealth than their optimal targets, and the wealth deficit of those who are under-saving is generally small.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 643
页数:37
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Consumption versus expenditure [J].
Aguiar, M ;
Hurst, E .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2005, 113 (05) :919-948
[2]  
Banks J, 1998, AM ECON REV, V88, P769
[3]   What accounts for the variation in retirement wealth among US households? [J].
Bernheim, BD ;
Skinner, J ;
Weinberg, S .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :832-857
[4]  
BLAU D, 2004, UNPUB RETIREMENT CON
[5]  
Brown J., 2004, 10989 NBER
[6]   Buffer-stock saving and the life cycle/permanent income hypothesis [J].
Carroll, CD .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (01) :1-55
[7]  
CHANG SK, 2002, UNPUB SIMULATION EST
[8]   SAVING AND LIQUIDITY CONSTRAINTS [J].
DEATON, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1991, 59 (05) :1221-1248
[9]   Do the rich save more? [J].
Dynan, KE ;
Skinner, J ;
Zeldes, SP .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2004, 112 (02) :397-444
[10]  
ENGEN EM, 1999, BROOKINGS PAPERS EC