The truth-conditional relevance of de re modes of presentation: A reply to Grimberg

被引:1
作者
Bezuidenhout, A
机构
[1] Department of Philosophy, University of South Carolina, Columbia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-0017.1996.tb00055.x
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Grimberg identifies four arguments which she alleges are used in my paper 'pragmatics and Singular Reference' (Bezuidenhout, 1996a) in order to establish the truth-conditional relevance of de re modes of presentation. In fact, only one of these, properly understood, is an argument which I would endorse. However, I do plead guilty to having used examples with features which misleadingly suggest that I endorse these various arguments. It is an easy matter to construct examples free from these defects, which is what I attempt to do.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Pragmatics and singular reference [J].
Bezuidenhout, A .
MIND & LANGUAGE, 1996, 11 (02) :133-159
[2]  
BEZUIDENHOUT A, 1996, IN PRESS NOUS
[3]  
BEZUIDENHOUT A, 1996, IN PRESS MIND
[4]  
Blakemore Diane., 1987, Semantic Constraints on Relevance
[5]   CONJUNCTION, EXPLANATION AND RELEVANCE [J].
CARSTON, R .
LINGUA, 1993, 90 (1-2) :27-48
[6]  
Recanati F., 1993, Direct Reference
[7]   ON THE REFERENTIAL ATTRIBUTIVE DISTINCTION [J].
ROUCHOTA, V .
LINGUA, 1992, 87 (1-2) :137-167
[8]   LINGUISTIC FORM AND RELEVANCE [J].
WILSON, D ;
SPERBER, D .
LINGUA, 1993, 90 (1-2) :1-25