Clinical and economic factors important to anaesthetic choice for day-case surgery

被引:42
作者
Eger, EI
White, PF
Bogetz, MS
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Anesthesia & Perioperat Care, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Texas, SW Med Sch, Dept Anesthesiol, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-200017030-00003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Clinical and economic factors that are important to consider when selecting anaesthesia for day-case surgery can differ from those for inpatient anaesthesia. Patients undergoing day-case surgery tend to be healthier and have shorter durations of surgery. They expect less anxiety before surgery, amnesia for the surgical experience, a rapid return to normal (normal mentation with minimal pain and nausea) after surgery, and lower expenses. However, the latter 2 expectations can conflict; older generic drugs have lower acquisition costs but often impose longer recovery times. Longer recovery periods can increase costs by prolonging the time to discharge from labour-intensive areas such as the operating suite or the postanaesthesia recovery unit. The challenge for today's anaesthetist is to use newer drugs judiciously to minimise their expense without compromising the rate or quality of recovery. Several approaches can secure these aims. Most apply the least anaesthetic needed. 'Least anaesthetic' may mean the particular form of anaesthetic (e.g. local infiltration with monitored anaesthesia care versus a general anaesthetic), or may mean the delivery of the smallest effective dose, perhaps guided by anaesthetic monitors such as end-tidal analysers or the bispectral index. For patients requiring general anaesthesia, a combination of several drugs usually secures the closest approach to the ideal. Drug combinations used usually include a short-acting preoperative anxiolytic (e.g. midazolam), intravenous propofol (a short-acting potent anxiolytic and amnestic agent) for induction of anaesthesia (and sometimes for maintenance) and primary maintenance of anaesthesia with inhaled nitrous oxide combined with a poorly soluble (low solubility produces rapid recovery, the least soluble is desflurane) potent inhaled anaesthetic delivered at a low inflow rate (to minimise cost). Although old, nitrous oxide is inexpensive and has favourable pharmacokinetic and cardiovascular advantages; however, it is limited in its anaesthetic/amnestic potency, and has the capacity to increase nausea. In children, induction of anaesthesia is often accomplished with sevoflurane rather than desflurane; although sevoflurane is modestly more soluble than desflurane, it is nonpungent whereas desflurane is pungent. Moderate- or short-acting opioids (fentanyl is popular) ol nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (especially ketorolac), or local anaesthetics are added to secure analgesia during and after surgery. Similarly, when needed, moderate- or short-acting muscle relaxants are selected. Before the end of anaesthesia, an intravenous antiemetic may be given. With this drug combination, patients usually awaken within minutes after anaesthesia and can often move themselves to the vehicle for transport to the recovery unit. These combinations of anaesthetics and techniques minimise use of expensive drugs while expediting recovery (again minimising cost) with minimal or no compromise in the quality of recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 262
页数:18
相关论文
共 154 条
[1]   Cost-effectiveness of inhalational, balanced and total intravenous anaesthesia for ambulatory knee surgery [J].
Alhashemi, JA ;
Miller, DR ;
OBrien, HV ;
Hull, KA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1997, 44 (02) :118-125
[2]  
ALONSO CA, 1998, REV ESP ANESTESIOL R, V45, P184
[3]   Greater incidence of delirium during recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia in preschool boys [J].
Aono, J ;
Ueda, W ;
Mamiya, K ;
Takimoto, E ;
Manabe, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (06) :1298-1300
[4]   Comparison of induction and recovery between sevoflurane and halothane supplementation of anaesthesia in children undergoing outpatient dental extractions [J].
Ariffin, SA ;
Whyte, JA ;
Malins, AF ;
Cooper, GM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 78 (02) :157-159
[5]   Comparison of desflurane with isoflurane or propofol in spontaneously breathing ambulatory patients [J].
Ashworth, J ;
Smith, I .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (02) :312-318
[6]  
Avramov MN, 1998, ANESTH ANALG, V87, P666
[7]   Sevoflurane or halothane anesthesia: Can we tell the difference? [J].
Bacher, A ;
Burton, AW ;
Uchida, T ;
Zornow, MH .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 85 (06) :1203-1206
[8]   The impact of choice of muscle relaxant on postoperative recovery time: A retrospective study [J].
Ballantyne, JC ;
Chang, YC .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 85 (03) :476-482
[9]   Low-flow anaesthesia with desflurane [J].
Baum, J ;
Berghoff, M ;
Stanke, HG ;
Petermeyer, M ;
Kalff, G .
ANAESTHESIST, 1997, 46 (04) :287-293
[10]   Comparative effects of desflurane and isoflurane on recovery after long lasting anaesthesia [J].
Beaussier, M ;
Deriaz, H ;
Abdelahim, Z ;
Aissa, F ;
Lienhart, A .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1998, 45 (05) :429-434