Religiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology

被引:189
作者
Brossard, Dominique [1 ,2 ]
Scheufele, Dietram A. [3 ,4 ]
Kim, Eunkyung [1 ,5 ]
Lewenstein, Bruce V. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Journalism & Mass Commun, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] UW Madison Robert & Jean Holtz Ctr Sci & Technol, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Life Sci Commun, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[4] Arizona State Univ, NSF, Funded Ctr Nanotechnol Soc, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Hlth Enhancement Syst Studies, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[6] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ATTITUDES; RISKS; SCIENCE; TRUST; COMMUNICATION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGIES; INFORMATION; KNOWLEDGE; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1177/0963662507087304
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Using national survey data, we examine how people use science media, factual knowledge related to nanotechnology, and predispositions such as strength of religious beliefs, to form attitudes about nanotechnology. We show that strength of religious beliefs is negatively related to support for funding of the technology. Our findings also confirm that science media use plays an important role in shaping positive attitudes toward the technology. Overall public support for funding nanotechnology is not directly related to levels of knowledge among the electorate, but on risk and benefits perceptions and the use of media frames. However, knowledge about the technology does tend to be interpreted through the lens of religious beliefs and therefore indirectly affect levels of support..
引用
收藏
页码:546 / 558
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The Reasoning Voter. Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns
[2]  
Bainbridge W.S., 2003, J EVOLUTION TECHNOLO, V13
[3]   Media attention and exposure in relation to support for agricultural biotechnology [J].
Besley, JC ;
Shanahan, J .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2005, 26 (04) :347-367
[4]  
Bodmer W., 1985, The Public Understanding of Science
[5]   Deference to scientific authority among a low information public: Understanding US Opinion on agricultural biotechnology [J].
Brossard, Dominique ;
Nisbet, Matthew C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2007, 19 (01) :24-52
[6]  
Broussard D., 2003, Mass Communication and Society, V6, P291, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S15327825MCS06034, 10.1207/S15327825MCS0603_4]
[7]   Framing effects on public opinion about nanotechnology [J].
Cobb, MD .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2005, 27 (02) :221-239
[8]  
Cohen J., 2003, Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences
[9]  
Covello V., 2001, Solutions to an Environment in Peril, P164
[10]  
Dunwoody S., 1991, RISKY BUSINESS COMMU, P11