The molecular origins of species-specific facial pattern

被引:33
作者
Brugmann, Samantha A. [1 ]
Tapadia, Minal D. [1 ]
Helms, Jill A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
CURRENT TOPICS IN DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, VOL 73 | 2006年 / 73卷
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0070-2153(05)73001-5
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The prevailing approach within the field of craniofacial development is focused on finding a balance between tissues (e.g., facial epithelia, neuroectoderm, and neural crest) and molecules (e.g., bone morphogenetic proteins, fibroblast growth factors, Wnts) that play a role in sculpting the face. We are rapidly learning that neither these tissues nor molecular signals are able to act in isolation; in fact, molecular cues are constantly reciprocating signals between the epithelia and the neural crest in order to pattern and mold facial structures. More recently, it has been proposed that this crosstalk is often mediated and organized by discrete organizing centers within the tissues that are able to act as a self-contained unit of developmental potential (e.g., the rhombomere and perhaps the ectomere). Whatever the molecules are and however they are interpreted by these tissues, it appears that there is a remarkably conserved mechanism for setting up the initial organization of the facial prominences between species. Regardless of species, all vertebrates appear to have the same basic bauplan. However, sometime during mid-gestation, the vertebrate face begins to exhibit species-specific variations, in large part due to differences in the rates of growth and differentiation of cells comprising the facial prominences. How do these differences arise? Are they due to fate changes in molecular signaling within the facial prominences themselves? Or are these late changes a reflection of earlier, more subtle alterations in boundaries and fields that are established at the earliest stages of head formation? We do not have clear answers to these questions yet, but in this chapter we present new studies that shed light on this age-old question. This chapter aims to present the known signals, both on a molecular and cellular level, responsible for craniofacial development while bringing to light the events that may serve to create difference in facial morphology seen from species to species. (c) 2006, Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / +
页数:268
相关论文
共 156 条
[1]  
Abu-Issa R, 2002, DEVELOPMENT, V129, P4613
[2]   Bmp4 and morphological variation of beaks in Darwin's finches [J].
Abzhanov, A ;
Protas, M ;
Grant, BR ;
Grant, PR ;
Tabin, CJ .
SCIENCE, 2004, 305 (5689) :1462-1465
[3]   Shh and Fgf8 act synergistically to drive cartilage outgrowth during cranial development [J].
Abzhanov, A ;
Tabin, CJ .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 273 (01) :134-148
[4]  
ABZHANOV A, 2005, UNPUB DEV DYN
[5]   Directional selection has shaped the oral jaws of Lake Malawi cichlid fishes [J].
Albertson, RC ;
Streelman, JT ;
Kocher, TD .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (09) :5252-5257
[6]   Genetic basis of adaptive shape differences in the cichlid head [J].
Albertson, RC ;
Streelman, JT ;
Kocher, TD .
JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 2003, 94 (04) :291-301
[7]   casanova plays an early and essential role in endoderm formation in zebrafish [J].
Alexander, J ;
Rothenberg, M ;
Henry, GL ;
Stainier, DYR .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1999, 215 (02) :343-357
[8]  
Altmann CR, 2001, INT REV CYTOL, V203, P447
[9]  
Aybar MJ, 2002, BIOL RES, V35, P267, DOI 10.4067/S0716-97602002000200018
[10]   Early induction of neural crest cells: lessons learned from frog, fish and chick [J].
Aybar, MJ ;
Mayor, R .
CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 12 (04) :452-458