Indirect estimation of chlamydia screening coverage using public health surveillance data

被引:32
作者
Levine, WC
Dicker, LW
Devine, O
Mosure, DJ
机构
[1] CDCP, Epidemiol & Surveillance Branch, Div STD Prevent, Natl Ctr HIV STD & TB Prevent, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
[2] CDCP, Natl Ctr Birth Defects & Dev Disabil, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
adolescent; chlamydia; mass screening;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwh162
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Although routine screening of all sexually active adolescent females for Chlamydia trachomatis infection is recommended at least annually in the United States, no national or state-specific population-based estimates of chlamydia screening coverage are known to exist. Conclusions regarding screening coverage have often been based on surveys of health care provider or facility screening practices, but such surveys do not consider persons who do not seek care at these facilities or who seek care at more than one facility. The authors developed a method to estimate the proportion of sexually active females aged 15-19 years screened for chlamydia in 45 states and the District of Columbia by using national data on chlamydia positivity, estimates of sexual activity from the National Survey of Family Growth, and chlamydial infections reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Because of uncertainty regarding these values and related assumptions, credibility intervals were calculated by using a Monte Carlo model. When this model was used, the median state-specific proportion of sexually active females aged 15-19 years screened in 2000 was 60% (90% credibility interval: 55, 66). These results and this method should be evaluated for their utility in guiding implementation of national and state chlamydia control programs.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 96
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
*A GUTTM I, 2000, FAM PLANN ANN REP 1
[2]  
ABMA C, 1997, VITAL HLTH STAT, V23, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, GUID CLIN PREV SERV
[4]  
*CDCP, 2001, SEX TRANSM DIS SURV
[5]  
CHOW JM, 2002 NAT STD PREV C
[6]   Chlamydia positivity versus prevalence -: What's the difference? [J].
Dicker, LW ;
Mosure, DJ ;
Levine, WC .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 1998, 25 (05) :251-253
[7]  
Herrera J. L., 1993, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V42, P1
[8]   Knock-knock:: A population-based survey of risk behavior, health care access, and Chlamydia trachomatis infection among low-income women in the San Francisco Bay area [J].
Klausner, JD ;
McFarland, W ;
Bolan, G ;
Hernandez, MT ;
Molitor, F ;
Lemp, GF ;
Cahoon-Young, B ;
Morrow, S ;
Ruiz, J .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 183 (07) :1087-1092
[9]  
KROWINSKI WJ, 1996, MEASURING MANAGING P, P181
[10]   Pilot study of the prevalence of chlamydial infection in a national household survey [J].
Mertz, KJ ;
McQuillan, GM ;
Levine, WC ;
Candal, DH ;
Bullard, JC ;
Johnson, RE ;
St Louis, ME ;
Black, CM .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 1998, 25 (05) :225-228