An in vitro mucosal model for prediction of the bioadhesion of alginate solutions to the oesophagus

被引:75
作者
Batchelor, HK
Banning, D
Dettmar, PW
Hampson, FC
Jolliffe, IG
Craig, DQM
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Pharm, Belfast BT9 7BL, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Reckitt Benckiser, Kingston Upon Hull HU8 7DS, N Humberside, England
[3] Univ London, Sch Pharm, London WC1N 1AX, England
关键词
alginate; bioadhesion; mucoadhesion; oesophagus;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00062-5
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the development of an in vitro model utilised to assess the adhesion of alginate solutions to porcine oesophageal tissue. The methodology involved the construction of retention apparatus onto which sections of tissue were mounted. Fluorescently labelled alginate solutions of known theological profile were dispensed onto the tissue at a concentration of 2% w/v. A washing solution was applied at a specified rate to mimic saliva flow and the eluted material collected. Fluorimetric, analysis allowed dose retention to be assessed as a function of time. The effect of the nature of the washing solution and the choice of alginate were investigated. It was found that after 30 min up to 20% of the applied alginate dose remained associated with the tissue, regardless of the alginate selected from the range examined. The nature of the washing medium did not have a significant effect on retention, irrespective of the inherent mucin concentration. Overall this study indicated that the technique presented offers a viable means of studying bioadhesion of liquids and also demonstrates that alginate solutions may have an application as bioadhesive agents for localisation within the oesophagus. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 132
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] BANNING D, 1998, PHARMACOL RES S, V1, P426
  • [2] A new CSLM-based method for determination of the phase behaviour of aqueous mixtures of biopolymers
    Blonk, JCG
    vanEendenburg, J
    Koning, MMG
    Weisenborn, PCM
    Winkel, C
    [J]. CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS, 1995, 28 (04) : 287 - 295
  • [3] Chen J.L., 1970, ADHESION BIOL SYSTEM, P163, DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-469050-9.50015-6
  • [4] DAWES C, 1974, International Journal of Chronobiology, V2, P253
  • [5] Comparative mucoretention of sucralfate suspensions in an everted rat esophagus model
    Dobrozsi, DJ
    Smith, RL
    Sakr, AA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 1999, 189 (01) : 81 - 89
  • [6] COMPARATIVE CONCENTRATIONS OF SELECTED TRACE METALS IN HUMAN AND MARMOSET SALIVA
    DREIZEN, S
    LEVY, BM
    NIEDERME.W
    GRIGGS, JH
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 1970, 15 (03) : 179 - &
  • [7] Embleton JV, 1998, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V64, P3503
  • [8] HARDY JG, 1993, EUR J PHARM BIOPHARM, V39, P70
  • [9] Development of a "continuous-flow adhesion cell" for the assessment of hydrogel adhesion
    Le Ray, AM
    Iooss, P
    Gouyette, A
    Vonarx, V
    Patrice, T
    Merle, C
    [J]. DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY, 1999, 25 (08) : 897 - 904
  • [10] Lentner C., 1981, GEIGY SCI TABLES UNI, V1