The efficacy and safety of brinzolamide 1% ophthalmic suspension (Azopt®) as a primary therapy in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

被引:52
作者
Sall, K
机构
[1] Bellflower, CA 90706
关键词
Azopt (R); brinzolamide; carbonic anhydrase inhibitor; dorzolamide; glaucoma; ocular hypertension; open-angle glaucoma; primary therapy;
D O I
10.1016/S0039-6257(99)00107-1
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
A randomized, multicenter, double-masked, prospective, parallel study was designed to establish the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brinzolamide 1.0% (Azopt(R)) as a primary therapy compared with dorzolamide 2.0% (Trusopt(R)) and placebo in patients diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma (with or without a pseudoexfoliative or a pigmentary dispersion component) or ocular hypertension. Brinzolamide 1.0%, dosed two times (b.i.d.) and three times (t.i.d.) a day, dorzolamide 2.0% (t.i.d.), and placebo (t.i.d) were administered to patients during a 3-month treatment period. Diurnally corrected IOP reduction from baseline, including peak and trough times, was the primary end point. Sample sizes were chosen to establish statistical equivalence between treatments. Mean IOP changes observed on treatment were as follows: -3.4 mm Hg (-13.2%) to -4.1 mm Hg (-16.7%) with brinzolamide 1.0% b.i.d.; -4.1 mm Hg (-16.6%) to -4.8 mm Hg (-19.1%) with brinzolamide 1% t.i.d.; and -4.3 mm Hg (-16.9%) to -4.9 mm PIS (-20.1%)with dorzolamide 2.0%. IOP reductions after administration of brinzolamide 1.0% b.i.d. and t.i.d. were equivalent to each other and also clinically and statistically equivalent to those with dorzolamide 2.0% t.i.d. The incidence of ocular discomfort (burning and stinging) upon instillation was significantly higher for dorzolamide (10.7%) than brinzolamide (b.i.d. or t.i.d., 3.0% each). The most frequent nonocular event reported was taste perversion, which was less (3.7%) with brinzolamide 1.0% b.i.d., but brinzolamide t.i.d. was similar to dorzolamide t.i.d. (6.8% vs. 5.3%). Brinzolamide 1.0% b.i.d., brinzolamide 1.0% t.i.d., and dorzolamide 2.0% t.i.d. equaled each other in IOP-lowering efficacy, and brinzolamide was significantly more comfortable than dorzolamide upon instillation. (C) 2000 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S155 / S162
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Camras C. B., 1997, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, V38, pS560
[2]  
Donohue EK, 1996, J GLAUCOMA, V5, P68
[3]   CARBONIC-ANHYDRASE INHIBITOR SIDE-EFFECTS - SERUM CHEMICAL-ANALYSIS [J].
EPSTEIN, DL ;
GRANT, WM .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1977, 95 (08) :1378-1382
[4]   PATIENT TOLERANCE TO CARBONIC-ANHYDRASE INHIBITORS [J].
LICHTER, PR ;
NEWMAN, LP ;
WHEELER, NC ;
BEALL, OV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1978, 85 (04) :495-502
[5]  
March W. F., 1998, IOVS, V39, pS199
[6]   Adjunctive therapy with brinzolamide 1% ophthalmic suspension (Azopt®) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension maintained on timolol therapy [J].
Shin, D .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 44 :S163-S168
[7]  
Shin D. H., 1997, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, V38, pS559
[8]  
SILVER L, IN PRESS AM J OPHTHA
[9]   Dose-response evaluation of the ocular hypotensive effect of brinzolamide ophthalmic suspension (Azopt®) [J].
Silver, LH .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 44 :S147-S153
[10]   Ocular comfort of brinzolamide 1.0% ophthalmic suspension compared with dorzolamide 2.0% ophthalmic solution: Results from two multicenter comfort studies [J].
Silver, LH .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 44 :S141-S145