Sinusoidal cycling swimming pattern of reservoir fishes

被引:56
作者
Cech, M
Kubecka, J
机构
[1] Acad Sci Czech Republ, Inst Hydrobiol, Ceske Budejovice 37005, Czech Republic
[2] Univ S Bohemia, Fac Biol Sci, Ceske Budejovice 37005, Czech Republic
关键词
Rimov Reservoir; sinusoidal swimming; echosounder; facultatively planktivorous fishes;
D O I
10.1006/jfbi.2002.2053
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
A circular split-beam transducer (7, nominal angle), fixed on the bottom close to the deepest point (c. 36 m) of the Rimov Reservoir and beaming up towards the surface showed that most fishes stayed in the epilimnion during the summer. The majority (83%) of larger fish individuals (136-359 rum L-S; maximum target strength, TSmax, ranged from - 42-2 to - 34-1 dB) in open water performed very characteristic sinusoidal movements in the vertical plane during July and August. As they crossed the sonar beam (3-4 m wide), the fishes changed their depth several times (frequency 1.3-10.1 cycles min(-1)) with amplitude of 19-321 cm. The trajectory of fish vertical oscillations was in many cases greater than the trajectory of their horizontal movement. Fishes started to swim up-and-down after sunrise and continued doing so during daytime. The sinusoidal movement pattern was replaced by direct movement before sunset. A number of descriptive parameters of up-and-down movement is proposed and their ranges are given. Variation of target strength indicates active changes of fish tilt (30degrees on average) in transient phases of the sinusoidal cycle rather than changes of swim bladder volume. Up-and-down fish swimming is likely to be an efficient way of visual inspecting a larger volume of the epilimnion for prey, mainly large zooplankton (Daphnia, Leptodora), whose epilimnetic density in the Rimov Reservoir is low and patchy in summer time. (C) 2002 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved,
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 471
页数:16
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Can stationary bottom split-beam hydroacoustics be used to measure fish swimming speed in situ? [J].
Arrhenius, F ;
Benneheij, BJAM ;
Rudstam, LG ;
Boisclair, D .
FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2000, 45 (01) :31-41
[2]  
BOHL E, 1980, OECOLOGIA, V44, P368, DOI 10.1007/BF00545241
[3]   HABITAT SHIFT IN ROACH (RUTILUS-RUTILUS) INDUCED BY PIKEPERCH (STIZOSTEDION-LUCIOPERCA) INTRODUCTION - PREDATION RISK VERSUS PELAGIC BEHAVIOR [J].
BRABRAND, A ;
FAAFENG, B .
OECOLOGIA, 1993, 95 (01) :38-46
[4]   FISH IN RESERVOIRS [J].
FERNANDO, CH ;
HOLCIK, J .
INTERNATIONALE REVUE DER GESAMTEN HYDROBIOLOGIE, 1991, 76 (02) :149-167
[5]  
Foote K. G., 1987, COOPERATIVE RES REPO, V144, P1
[6]  
GLIWICZ ZM, 1992, ARCH HYDROBIOL, V124, P385
[7]  
GOLDFARB M, 1990, CELL GROWTH DIFFER, V1, P439
[8]   COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF FEEDING AND SCHOOLING BEHAVIOR OF THE CYPRINIDAE ALBURNUS-ALBURNUS (L, 1758), RUTILUS-RUTILUS (L 1758), AND SCARDINIUS-ERYTHROPHTHALMUS (L, 1758) IN A BACKWATER OF THE DANUBE NEAR VIENNA [J].
HABERLEHNER, E .
INTERNATIONALE REVUE DER GESAMTEN HYDROBIOLOGIE, 1988, 73 (05) :537-546
[9]   Lacustrine fishes and the trophic efficiency of lakes:: prelude to the problem [J].
Holcík, J .
ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1998, 65 :411-414
[10]  
Imbrock F, 1996, J FISH BIOL, V49, P1