Assessing regional impacts of change: linking economic and environmental models

被引:17
作者
Attwood, JD
McCarl, B [1 ]
Chen, CC
Eddleman, BR
Nayda, B
Srinivasan, R
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Agr Econ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] USDA, Nat Resources Conservat Serv, Temple, TX 76502 USA
[3] Texas Agr Expt Stn, Corpus Christi Res Ctr, Corpus Christi, TX 78406 USA
[4] Capital One Financial, Falls Church, VA 22042 USA
关键词
resource policy; resource modeling; agriculture; watershed; environment; economic; mathematical programming; agriculture sector model; SWAT model;
D O I
10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00077-3
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Increasingly, natural resource policy makers and program administrators are requiring that analysis of proposed changes include estimates of both environmental and economic implications. That requirement poses a difficulty for researchers since the spatial scale of models used for environmental analysis and for economic analysis are structured differently. In this paper we show how the differing spatial scales can be reconciled in a national analysis involving an agricultural model with state- and county-level-based geographical boundaries and a watershed model involving watershed boundaries. This type of modeling system integration has been done in analysis of single or multiple watershed-level issues, but our paper is the first to show a method for a national-level analysis involving state- and substate-level economic results and small watershed environmental results. The procedures and results are shown for a national cropland erosion control policy and for the release by one state experiment station of improved crop varieties. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 159
页数:13
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   VALUE OF IMPROVED LONG-RANGE WEATHER INFORMATION [J].
ADAMS, RM ;
BRYANT, KJ ;
MCCARL, BA ;
LEGLER, DM ;
OBRIEN, J ;
SOLOW, A ;
WEIHER, R .
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 1995, 13 (03) :10-19
[2]   THE BENEFITS OF POLLUTION-CONTROL - THE CASE OF OZONE AND UNITED-STATES AGRICULTURE [J].
ADAMS, RM ;
HAMILTON, SA ;
MCCARL, BA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1986, 68 (04) :886-893
[3]   Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment - Part 1: Model development [J].
Arnold, JG ;
Srinivasan, R ;
Muttiah, RS ;
Williams, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1998, 34 (01) :73-89
[4]  
CHANG CC, 1994, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V49, P606
[5]   SECTORAL IMPLICATIONS OF FARM PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS [J].
CHANG, CC ;
MCCARL, BA ;
MJELDE, JW ;
RICHARDSON, JW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1992, 74 (01) :38-49
[6]  
CLARKE N, 1997, IMPACT METHODS PREDI
[7]  
*ESRI, 1995, UND GIS ARC INFO MET
[8]   CROPPING ACTIVITIES IN AGRICULTURAL SECTOR MODELS - A METHODOLOGICAL PROPOSAL [J].
MCCARL, BA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1982, 64 (04) :768-772
[9]  
McCarl BA, 1998, DOCUMENTATION ASM US
[10]   EXACT AGGREGATION IN MATHEMATICAL-PROGRAMMING SECTOR MODELS [J].
ONAL, H ;
MCCARL, BA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIE RURALE, 1991, 39 (02) :319-334