Campylobacter in waterfowl and aquatic environments:: Incidence and methods of detection

被引:61
作者
Abulreesh, Hussein H.
Paget, Timothy A.
Goulder, Raymond
机构
[1] Umm Al Qura Univ, Dept Biol, Mecca 21955, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ Kent & Greenwich, Medway Sch Pharm, Medway ME4 4TP, Kent, England
[3] Univ Hull, Dept Biol Sci, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es060327l
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Campylobacters are emerging as one of the most significant causes of human infections worldwide, and the role that waterfowl and the aquatic environment have in the spread of disease is beginning to be elucidated. On a world scale campylobacters are possibly the major cause of gastrointestinal infections. Campylobacters are common commensals in the intestinal tract of many species of wild birds, including waterfowl. They are also widely distributed in aquatic environments where their origins may include waterfowl as well as sewage effluents and agricultural runoff. Campylobacters have marked seasonal trends. In temperate aquatic environments they peak during winter, whereas spring-summer is the peak period for human infection. Campylobacter species may survive, and remain potentially pathogenic, for long periods in aquatic environments. The utility of bacterial fecal indicators in predicting the presence of campylobacters in natural waters is questionable. Viable but nonculturable Campylobacter cells may occur, but whether they have any role in the generation of outbreaks of campylobacteriosis is unclear. The routine detection of Campylobacter spp. in avian feces and environmental waters largely relies on conventional culture methods, while the recognition of a particular species or strain is based on serotyping and increasingly on molecular methods. Thus, PCR combined with selective enrichment enhances the detection of campylobacters in water and feces, while DNA sequencing facilitates recognition of particular species and strains.
引用
收藏
页码:7122 / 7131
页数:10
相关论文
共 151 条
[1]   DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PENNER SEROTYPING AND POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION FINGERPRINTING OF CAMPYLOBACTER ISOLATED FROM POULTRY AND OTHER ANIMAL SOURCES [J].
AARTS, HJM ;
VANLITH, LAJT ;
JACOBSREITSMA, WF .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 20 (06) :371-374
[2]   Waterfowl and the bacteriological quality of amenity ponds [J].
Abulreesh, H. H. ;
Paget, T. A. ;
Goulder, R. .
JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2004, 2 (03) :183-189
[3]  
Abulreesh H. H., 2005, P 3 WORLD WAT C GUAN, P356
[4]   Recovery of thermophilic campylobacters from pond water and sediment and the problem of interference by background bacteria in enrichment culture [J].
Abulreesh, HH ;
Paget, TA ;
Goulder, R .
WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (13) :2877-2882
[5]  
ABULREESH HH, 2005, THESIS U HULL ENGLAN
[6]   Optimization of PCR-based methods for rapid detection of Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli and Yersinia enterocolitica serovar 0:3 in wastewater samples [J].
Alexandrino, M ;
Grohmann, E ;
Szewzyk, U .
WATER RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (05) :1340-1346
[7]   PRESENCE OF CAMPYLOBACTER IN MARINE WATERS OF VALENCIA, SPAIN [J].
ALONSO, JL ;
ALONSO, MA .
WATER RESEARCH, 1993, 27 (10) :1559-1562
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1998, STAND METH EX WAT WA, V20th
[9]  
ARVANITIDOU M, 1995, MICROBIOL RES, V150, P153
[10]   A SURVEY ON CAMPYLOBACTER AND YERSINIA SPP OCCURRENCE IN SEA AND RIVER WATERS IN NORTHERN GREECE [J].
ARVANITIDOU, M ;
CONSTANTINIDIS, TC ;
KATSOUYANNOPOULOS, V .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 171 (1-3) :101-106