Levofloxacin in the empirical treatment of patients with suspected bacteraemia/sepsis:: comparison with imipenem/cilastatin in an open, randomized trial

被引:23
作者
Geddes, A [1 ]
Thaler, M
Schonwald, S
Härkönen, M
Jacobs, F
Nowotny, I
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Med, Dept Infect Dis, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Infect Dis Unit, IL-52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel
[3] Univ Zagreb, Hosp Infect Dis, Zagreb 41000, Croatia
[4] Porvoo District Hosp, Porvoo, Finland
[5] Erasme Hosp, Infect Dis Clin, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Hoechst Mar Roussel, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jac/44.6.799
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
An open, randomized, multinational, multicentre study was conducted to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of levofloxacin 500 mg twice daily with imipenem/cilastatin 1 g iv three-times daily in the treatment of hospitalized adult patients with clinically suspected bacteraemia/ sepsis. Levofloxacin patients could change from iv to oral administration after a minimum of 48 h iv treatment if clinical signs and symptoms of sepsis had improved. The primary efficacy analysis was based on the clinical and bacteriological response at clinical endpoint. A total of 503 patients were randomized and 499 included in the intent-to-treat population. The perprotocol population comprised 287 patients with bacteriologically proven infection. Clinical cure rates at clinical endpoint in the intent-to-treat population and per-protocol population were 77% (184/239) and 89% (125/140), respectively, for levofloxacin and 68% (178/260) and 85% (125/147), respectively, for imipenem/cilastatin. At follow-up, the cure rates in the per-protocol population were 84% for levofloxacin and 69% for imipenem/cilastatin. The 95% confidence interval for both populations showed that levofloxacin was as effective as imipenem/cilastatin. A satisfactory bacteriological response was obtained in 87% (96/110) of levofloxacin patients and 84% (97/116) of imipenem/cilastatin patients at clinical endpoint. Adverse events possibly related to the study drug were reported in 74 (31%) levofloxacin patients and 79 (30%) imipenem/cilastatin patients. There were no clinically appreciable differences between the treatment groups. Levofloxacin 500 mg twice daily, either iv or as sequential iv/oral therapy, was as effective and well tolerated as imipenem/cilastatin 1 g iv three-times daily in the treatment of hospitalized patients with suspected bacteraemia/sepsis.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 810
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MMWR
[2]  
BANERJEE SN, 1991, AM J MED S3B, V91, P86
[3]  
Bone R C, 1991, Infect Dis Clin North Am, V5, P793
[4]   DEFINITIONS FOR SEPSIS AND ORGAN FAILURE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INNOVATIVE THERAPIES IN SEPSIS [J].
BONE, RC ;
BALK, RA ;
CERRA, FB ;
DELLINGER, RP ;
FEIN, AM ;
KNAUS, WA ;
SCHEIN, RMH ;
SIBBALD, WJ .
CHEST, 1992, 101 (06) :1644-1655
[5]   The sepsis syndrome - Definition and general approach to management [J].
Bone, RC .
CLINICS IN CHEST MEDICINE, 1996, 17 (02) :175-&
[6]   Pharmacokinetic profile of levofloxacin following once-daily 500-milligram oral or intravenous doses [J].
Chien, SC ;
Rogge, MC ;
Gisclon, LG ;
Curtin, C ;
Wong, F ;
Natarajan, J ;
Williams, RR ;
Fowler, CL ;
Cheung, WK ;
Chow, AT .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1997, 41 (10) :2256-2260
[7]   Intravenous meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized patients [J].
Colardyn, F ;
Faulkner, KL .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 38 (03) :523-537
[8]  
DEABATE CA, 1997, RESP CARE, V42, P206
[9]   PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND TREATMENT OF GRAM-NEGATIVE SEPSIS [J].
DIPIRO, JT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1990, 47 (11) :S6-S10
[10]   Comparative in vitro activity of levofloxacin and ofloxacin against Gram-positive bacteria [J].
Eliopoulos, GM ;
Wennersten, CB ;
Moellering, RC .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1996, 25 (01) :35-41