Artificial neural networks for parameter estimation in geophysics

被引:105
作者
Calderón-Macías, C
Sen, MK
Stoffa, PL
机构
[1] Mobil Technol, Dallas, TX 75265 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Inst Geophys, Austin, TX 75265 USA
[3] Univ Texas, Dept Geol Sci, Austin, TX 75265 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2478.2000.00171.x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Artificial neural systems have been used in a variety of problems in the fields of science and engineering. Here we describe a study of the applicability of neural networks to solving some geophysical inverse problems. In particular, we study the problem of obtaining formation resistivities and layer thicknesses from vertical electrical sounding (VES) data and that of obtaining 1D velocity models from seismic waveform data. We use a two-layer feedforward neural network (FNN) that is trained to predict earth models from measured data. Part of the interest in using FNNs for geophysical inversion is that they are adaptive systems that perform a non-linear mapping between two sets of data from a given domain. In both of our applications, we train FNNs using synthetic data as input to the networks and a layer parametrization of the models as the network output. The earth models used for network training are drawn from an ensemble of random models within some prespecified parameter limits. For network training we use the back-propagation algorithm and a hybrid back-propagation-simulated-annealing method for the VES and seismic inverse problems, respectively. Other fundamental issues for obtaining accurate model parameter estimates using trained FNNs are the size of the training data, the network configuration, the description of the data and the model parametrization. Our simulations indicate that FNNs, if adequately trained, produce reasonably accurate earth models when observed data are input to the FNNs.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 47
页数:27
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, 63 ANN INT M, DOI DOI 10.1190/1.1822454
[2]  
Bhattacharya P. K., 1968, Direct Current Geoelectric Sounding: Principles and Interpretation
[3]   Automatic NMO correction and velocity estimation by a feedforward neural network [J].
Calderon-Macias, C ;
Sen, MK ;
Stoffa, PL .
GEOPHYSICS, 1998, 63 (05) :1696-1707
[4]  
Calderon-Macias C., 1993, SOC EXPLORATION GEOP, P254, DOI [10.1190/1.1822453, DOI 10.1190/1.1822453]
[5]   NONLINEAR INVERSION OF RESISTIVITY PROFILING DATA FOR SOME REGULAR GEOMETRICAL BODIES [J].
CHUNDURU, RK ;
SEN, MK ;
STOFFA, PL ;
NAGENDRA, R .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 1995, 43 (08) :979-1003
[6]  
Cichocki A., 1993, Neural Networks for Optimization and Signal Processing
[7]  
DAI H, 1994, 1 BREAK, V12, P605, DOI DOI 10.3997/1365-2397.1994038
[8]   AUTOMATIC PICKING OF SEISMIC ARRIVALS IN LOCAL EARTHQUAKE DATA USING AN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK [J].
DAI, HC ;
MACBETH, C .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 120 (03) :758-774
[9]  
Fish B. C., 1994, P SEG TECH PROGR JAN, P185
[10]  
Ghosh D. P., 1971, Geophysical Prospecting, V19, P192, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1971.tb00593.x