Comparison of the TOX A/B test to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay for the detection of Clostridium difficile in stools

被引:43
作者
Aldeen, WE
Bingham, M
Aiderzada, A
Kucera, J
Jense, S
Carroll, KC
机构
[1] Associated Reg & Univ Pathologists Inc, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0732-8893(00)00113-9
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The TOX A/B Test (Techlab, Blacksburg, VA, USA) was compared to cell culture cytotoxicity assay on 1109 consecutive diarrheal stool samples collected from patients with the presumptive diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disease. The TOX A/B Test is an enzyme immunoassay in a microtiter format that detects both toxins A and B. The procedure used for this study takes approximately 1.5 h to perform. Cell culture cytoxicity was performed by using a fibroblast cell line in a microtiter format read at 4 h, 24 h, and 48 h. One hundred ninety-four of the 1109 samples were positive by the "gold standard" cytoxicity assay, whereas 189 were positive by EIA. There was a 98.5% agreement between the two assays. When compared to the cytoxicity assay, the EIA had an initial sensitivity of 94.3% and a specificity of 99.3%. However, after resolution of six discrepants using another ELISA for toxin A detection the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for the TOX A/B test are as follows: 94.5%; 100%; 100%; 98.8%. The corresponding values for the cytotoxicity assay are: 97%; 100%; 100%; and 99.3%. This test seems to have excellent sensitivity and specificity as compared to an in-house cell culture cytotoxicity assay. It is sensitive enough to use as a stand-alone test for the detection of C. difficile toxin in laboratories that do not have cell culture cytotoxicity testing capability. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 213
页数:3
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF 3 ENZYME IMMUNOASSAYS, A CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY, AND TOXIGENIC CULTURE FOR DIAGNOSIS OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE ASSOCIATED DIARRHEA [J].
BARBUT, F ;
KAJZER, C ;
PLANAS, N ;
PETIT, JC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 31 (04) :963-967
[2]   LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE-ASSOCIATED GASTROINTESTINAL-DISEASE - COMPARISON OF A MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY FOR TOXIN-A AND TOXIN-B WITH A MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY FOR TOXIN-A ONLY AND 2 CYTOTOXICITY ASSAYS [J].
DOERN, GV ;
COUGHLIN, RT ;
WU, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (08) :2042-2046
[3]   DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE TOXINS ON TISSUE-CULTURED CELLS [J].
DONTA, ST ;
SULLIVAN, N ;
WILKINS, TD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1982, 15 (06) :1157-1158
[4]  
LYERLY D M, 1988, Clinical Microbiology Reviews, V1, P1
[5]   ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY FOR CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE TOXIN-A [J].
LYERLY, DM ;
SULLIVAN, NM ;
WILKINS, TD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1983, 17 (01) :72-78
[6]   Multicenter evaluation of the Clostridium difficile TOX A/B TEST [J].
Lyerly, DM ;
Neville, LM ;
Evans, DT ;
Fill, J ;
Allen, S ;
Greene, W ;
Sautter, R ;
Hnatuck, P ;
Torpey, DJ ;
Schwalbe, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (01) :184-190
[7]  
MERZ CS, 1994, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V32, P1143
[8]  
PETERSON LR, 1993, INFECT DIS CLIN N AM, V7, P277
[9]   COMPARISON OF THE VIDAS CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE TOXIN-A IMMUNOASSAY WITH CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE CULTURE AND CYTOTOXIN AND LATEX TESTS [J].
SHANHOLTZER, CJ ;
WILLARD, KE ;
HOLTER, JJ ;
OLSON, MM ;
GERDING, DN ;
PETERSON, LR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (07) :1837-1840
[10]   Multicenter evaluation of four methods for Clostridium difficile detection: ImmunoCard C-difficile, cytotoxin assay, culture, and latex agglutination [J].
Staneck, JL ;
Weckbach, LS ;
Allen, SD ;
Siders, JA ;
Gilligan, PH ;
Coppitt, G ;
Kraft, JA ;
Willis, DH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 34 (11) :2718-2721