Energy intensity in the iron and steel industry: a comparison of physical and economic indicators

被引:153
作者
Worrell, E
Price, L
Martin, N
Farla, J
Schaeffer, R
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF BERKELEY,LAWRENCE BERKELEY LAB,ENERGY ANAL PROGRAM,BERKELEY,CA 94720
[2] FED UNIV RIO DE JANEIRO,BR-21945970 RIO JANEIRO,BRAZIL
关键词
industrial energy intensity; energy efficiency; iron and steel;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00064-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Energy consumption of the iron and steel industry is examined in seven countries (Brazil, China, France, Germany, Japan, Poland and the United States) for the period 1980-1991, Using a decomposition analysis based on physical indicators for process type and product mix, we decompose intra-sectoral structural changes and efficiency improvements, Specific energy consumption decreased in all countries except Poland, Efficiency improvement played a key role in Brazil, China, Germany and the US, while structural changes were the main driver for energy savings in France and Japan, We also compare the use of various economic indicators to physical indicators and find that they do not track physical developments well in Poland or the developing countries we studied, In the industrialized countries, value added based energy intensity indicators generally reflect the specific energy consumption better than other economic indicators, although large differences occur in individual years, We found a smaller correlation between other economic indicators (gross output and value of shipments) and specific energy consumption, We conclude that use of physical energy intensity indicators improves comparability between countries, provides greater information for policy-makers regarding intra-sectoral structural changes, and provides detailed explanations for observed changes in energy intensity. (C) 1997 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 744
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
AICHINGER HM, 1993, GESAMTENERGIESITUA 2
[2]   DECOMPOSITION METHODOLOGY IN INDUSTRIAL ENERGY DEMAND ANALYSIS [J].
ANG, BW .
ENERGY, 1995, 20 (11) :1081-1095
[3]  
[Anonymous], POL IMPL GREENH WARM
[4]  
*ARB EN, 1980, PRIM END ERG
[5]  
BERENTKOWALSKA G, 1996, GTOWN URZ STAT
[6]  
COSTA MM, 1996, COMMUNICATION
[7]  
FAAIJ A, 1995, WORLDWIDE COMP EFFIC
[8]   Energy efficiency developments in the pulp and paper industry - A cross-country comparison using physical production data [J].
Farla, J ;
Blok, K ;
Schipper, L .
ENERGY POLICY, 1997, 25 (7-9) :745-758
[9]  
HENRIQUES MF, 1995, THESIS FEDERAL U RIO
[10]  
HOWARD R, 1991, KENYON REV, V13, P1