Is meta-analysis a Noah's ark for non-market valuation?

被引:108
作者
Smith, VK [1 ]
Pattanayak, SK
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Resources Future Inc, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[3] RII Int Res Triangle Pk, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[4] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
benefit transfer; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1023/A:1015567316109
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper describes meta-analytical methods as they have been applied to non-market valuation research. These studies have been used to review and synthesize literature and, more recently, in benefit transfer. This second use imposes a higher standard on the consistency in economic concepts being summarized and in the resources included in a meta-analysis. To meet this need, the paper proposes and illustrates a structural framework using a generalized method of moments estimator to estimate the parameters of a preference function with the benefits estimates usually encountered in meta-analytic summaries.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 296
页数:26
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
ANGRIST JD, 1992, J AM STAT ASSOC, V87, P328
[2]  
[Anonymous], ADV APPL MICROECONOM
[3]  
[Anonymous], KNOWLEDGE SOC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The handbook of research synthesis
[5]  
[Anonymous], RM107 USDA ROCK MOUN
[6]   Explanatory meta-analysis for the comparison and transfer of regional tourist income multipliers [J].
Baaijens, SR ;
Nijkamp, P ;
Van Montfort, K .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 1998, 32 (09) :839-849
[7]   The benefits of visibility improvement: New evidence from the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area [J].
Beron, K ;
Murdoch, J ;
Thayer, M .
JOURNAL OF REAL ESTATE FINANCE AND ECONOMICS, 2001, 22 (2-3) :319-337
[8]   PUBLIC-GOODS AS CHARACTERISTICS OF NONMARKET COMMODITIES [J].
BOCKSTAEL, NE ;
MCCONNELL, KE .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1993, 103 (420) :1244-1257
[9]   WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT GROUNDWATER VALUES - PRELIMINARY IMPLICATIONS FROM A METAANALYSIS OF CONTINGENT-VALUATION STUDIES [J].
BOYLE, KJ ;
POE, GL ;
BERGSTROM, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 76 (05) :1055-1061
[10]  
BROOKSHIRE DS, 1982, AM ECON REV, V72, P165