Cultural explanation of regional property markets: A critique

被引:21
作者
Ball, M [1 ]
机构
[1] S Bank Univ, Fac Built Environm, London SW8 2JZ, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00420980220142727
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In a recent paper in this journal, Simon Guy and John Henneberry (2000) proposed an institutional approach to property markets that emphasises exceptional behaviour on the part of particular market agents. Using this cultural approach, they claimed to have evidence that London-based property investors deliberately underinvest in British property outside southern England. This paper criticises their dismissal of pre-existing economic and institutional property market analysis and questions the validity of their empirical conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:1453 / 1469
页数:17
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Evaluation of investor behaviour in urban regeneration
    Adair, A
    Berry, J
    McGreal, S
    Deddis, B
    Hirst, S
    [J]. URBAN STUDIES, 1999, 36 (12) : 2031 - 2045
  • [2] Adair A., 1998, Journal of Property Research, V15, P331, DOI [10.1080/095999198368329, DOI 10.1080/095999198368329]
  • [3] ALONSO William., 1964, Location and land use. Toward a general theory of land rent.
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1997, The Cultural Crisis of the Firm
  • [5] Chasing a snail: Innovation and housebuilding firms' strategies
    Ball, M
    [J]. HOUSING STUDIES, 1999, 14 (01) : 9 - 22
  • [6] THE 1980S PROPERTY BOOM
    BALL, M
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1994, 26 (05) : 671 - 695
  • [7] Institutions in British property research: A review
    Ball, M
    [J]. URBAN STUDIES, 1998, 35 (09) : 1501 - 1517
  • [8] Ball M., 1998, EC COMMERCIAL PROPER
  • [9] BALL M, 2002, J PROPERTY RES, V19, P13
  • [10] Ball M, 1996, Housing and Construction. A Troubled Relationship?