Clinical relevance of diffusion tensor imaging parameters in lumbar disco-radicular conflict

被引:46
作者
Dallaudiere, B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lincot, J. [1 ]
Hess, A. [1 ,3 ]
Balbi, V. [4 ,5 ]
Cornelis, F. [6 ]
Larbi, A. [7 ]
Laissy, J. -P. [1 ,3 ]
Cotten, A. [4 ,5 ]
Schouman-Claeys, E. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Bichat Claude Bernard, Serv Radiol, F-75018 Paris, France
[2] Ctr Hosp Univ Bichat Claude Bernard, Inserm U698, F-75018 Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris 07, Fac Med Xavier Bichat, Paris, France
[4] Ctr Hosp Reg Univ Roger Salengro, Serv Radiol Osteo Articulaire, Lille, France
[5] Univ Lille 2, Fac Med, Lille, France
[6] Grp Hosp Pellegrin, Serv Imagerie Diagnost & Intervent Adulte, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[7] Clin Univ St Luc, MSK Dept Imaging, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Spine; Lumbar; Discoradicular conflict; Diffusion tensor imaging; Tractography; NERVE ROOT COMPRESSION; FIBER TRACTOGRAPHY; NUCLEUS PULPOSUS; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.diii.2013.08.019
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Purpose: To measure the fractional anisotropy (FA) and the mean diffusivity (MD) values of L4, L5 and S1 nerve roots using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and to correlate them with four different clinical patterns. Patients and methods: Fifty-six human participants were prospectively included and divided between four groups: healthy subjects, patients with clinical symptomatic nerve root pain with and without anatomical discoradicular conflict and patients with incidental anatomical discoradicular conflict seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI protocol included anatomical sequences (sagittal T1- and T2-weighted, axial T2-weighted) and a 25 directions DTI sequence. FA and MD values were measured in consensus by two readers and compared between the four groups. Results: Mean FA and MD values were significantly different for patients with clinically symptomatic nerve root pain (n = 27) both with (n = 16) (FA = 0.187 +/- 0.015; MD = 510 +/- 40) and without (n = 11) (FA = 0.193 +/- 0.011; MD = 490 +/- 30.5) anatomical discoradicular conflict compared to healthy subjects (n = 29) (FA = 0.221 +/- 0.011; MD = 460.9 +/- 35.5) including 2 subjects with incidental anatomical discoradicular conflict (FA = 0.211 +/- 0.013; MD = 450.8 +/- 41.2) on MRI ( P = 0.003). Conclusion: Measurement of FA and MD values of L4, L5 and S1 nerve roots using DTI could be useful in lumbar nerve root pain assessment. Further studies with different image processing methods are needed. (C) 2013 Editions francaises de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 68
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
Evaluation of Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tractography of the Median Nerve: Preliminary Results on Intrasubject Variability and Precision of Measurements [J].
Andreisek, Gustav ;
White, Lawrence M. ;
Kassner, Andrea ;
Sussman, Marshall S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (01) :W65-W72
[2]
Lumbar Spine: Agreement in the Interpretation of 1.5-T MR Images by Using the Nordic Modic Consensus Group Classification Form [J].
Arana, Estanislao ;
Royuela, Ana ;
Kovacs, Francisco M. ;
Estremera, Ana ;
Sarasibar, Helena ;
Amengual, Guillermo ;
Galarraga, Isabel ;
Martinez, Carmen ;
Muriel, Alfonso ;
Abraira, Victor ;
Teresa Gil del Real, Maria ;
Zamora, Javier ;
Campillo, Carlos .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 254 (03) :809-817
[3]
Tractography of lumbar nerve roots: initial results [J].
Balbi, Vincent ;
Budzik, Jean-Francois ;
Duhamel, Alain ;
Bera-Louville, Anne ;
Le Thuc, Vianney ;
Cotten, Anne .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (06) :1153-1159
[4]
Basser PJ, 2000, MAGNET RESON MED, V44, P625, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200010)44:4<625::AID-MRM17>3.0.CO
[5]
2-O
[6]
Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4) [J].
Bouhassira, D ;
Attal, N ;
Alchaar, H ;
Boureau, F ;
Brochet, B ;
Bruxelle, J ;
Cunin, G ;
Fermanian, J ;
Ginies, P ;
Grun-Overdyking, A ;
Jafari-Schluep, H ;
Lantéri-Minet, M ;
Laurent, B ;
Mick, G ;
Serrie, A ;
Valade, D ;
Vicaut, E .
PAIN, 2005, 114 (1-2) :29-36
[7]
Assessment of reduced field of view in diffusion tensor imaging of the lumbar nerve roots at 3 T [J].
Budzik, Jean-Francois ;
Verclytte, Sebastien ;
Lefebvre, Guillaume ;
Monnet, Aurelien ;
Forzy, Gerard ;
Cotten, Anne .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (05) :1361-1366
[8]
Quantitative Evaluation and Visualization of Lumbar Foraminal Nerve Root Entrapment by Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Preliminary Results [J].
Eguchi, Y. ;
Ohtori, S. ;
Orita, S. ;
Kamoda, H. ;
Arai, G. ;
Ishikawa, T. ;
Miyagi, M. ;
Inoue, G. ;
Suzuki, M. ;
Masuda, Y. ;
Andou, H. ;
Takaso, M. ;
Aoki, Y. ;
Toyone, T. ;
Watanabe, A. ;
Takahashi, K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2011, 32 (10) :1824-1829
[9]
Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of the lower spinal cord: application to diastematomyelia and tethered cord [J].
Filippi, Christopher G. ;
Andrews, Trevor ;
Gonyea, Jay V. ;
Linnell, Grant ;
Cauley, Keith A. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (09) :2194-2199
[10]
Diffusion tensor imaging: Concepts and applications [J].
Le Bihan, D ;
Mangin, JF ;
Poupon, C ;
Clark, CA ;
Pappata, S ;
Molko, N ;
Chabriat, H .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 13 (04) :534-546