A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial of the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily Losartan 100 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg and Losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg in the treatment of moderate-to-severe essential hypertension

被引:24
作者
Gradman, AH
Brady, WE
Gazdick, LP
Lyle, P
Zeldin, RK
机构
[1] Western Penn Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15224 USA
[2] Merck & Co Inc, Whitehouse Stn, NJ USA
关键词
hypertension; losartan; angiotensin-II receptor antagonist; hydrochlorothiazide;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(02)80018-2
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Many patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension require multiple drug therapy to achieve blood-pressure goals. Fixed-dose combination therapy with losartan and hydrochlorothiazide may be useful in this population. Objective: This study was conducted to obtain additional data on the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of once-daily, fixed-dose combinations of losartan and hydrochlorothiazide. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Patients greater than or equal to21 years of age with moderate-to-severe essential hypertension, defined as a mean trough sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) of 105 to 115 mm Hg, were randomly assigned in a 2:2:1 ratio to receive losartan 100 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg (L100/25), losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (L50/12.5), or placebo (PBO) once daily for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy measurement was the mean change from baseline in trough SiDBP in the 1-100/25 versus L50/12.5 treatment groups. Responders were defined as patients with mean trough SiDBP <90 mm Hg or a ≥ 10-mm Hg decrease in mean trough SiDBR Results: A total of 446 patients were randomly assigned to receive L100/25 (n = 173), L50/12.5 (n = 184), or PBO (n = 89). At week 8, mean trough SiDBP was significantly lower than at baseline in the 1-100/25 (-17.5 mm Hg), L50/12.5 (-15.2 mm Hg), and PBO groups (-8.5 mm Hg) (all P < 0.001). The difference between the active-treatment groups was statistically significant (-2.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, range -3.8 to -0.6) (P = 0.006), as was the difference between the 1-100/25 and PBO groups (-9.0 mm Hg; 95% CI, range -11.0 to -7.0) (P < 0.001) and the L50/12.5 and PBO groups (-6.7 mm Hg; 95% CI, range -8.7 to -4.8) (P < 0.001). At week 8, the percentages of responders were 86.7% (144 of 166), 78.9% (142 of 180), and 50.0% (42 of 84) in the L100/25, L50/12.5, and PBO groups, respectively. The incidence of adverse experiences (AEs) was 34.7% (60 of 173) in the L100/25 group, 23.9% (44 of 184) in the L50/12.5 group, and 32.6% (29 of 89) in the PBO group. The incidence of drug-related AEs was similar among the treatment groups (L100/25, 7.5% [13 of 173]; L50/12.5, 7.1% [13 of 184]; and PBO, 11.2% [10 of 89]). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the once-daily, fixed-dose combination L50/12.5 in patients with moderate-to-severe essential hypertension. In this study, L100/25 provided additional antihypertensive efficacy beyond that of L50/12.5 (and both were more efficacious than PBO). Approximately 4 of 5 patients (78.9%) treated with L50/12.5 responded to therapy, as did nearly 9 of 10 patients (86.7%) treated with L100/25. The tolerability profiles of L50/12.5 and L100/25 were similar to that of PBO.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1061
页数:13
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
American Heart Association, 2001, 2001 HEART STROK STA
[2]   PREVALENCE OF HYPERTENSION IN THE US ADULT-POPULATION - RESULTS FROM THE 3RD NATIONAL-HEALTH AND NUTRITION EXAMINATION SURVEY, 1988-1991 [J].
BURT, VL ;
WHELTON, P ;
ROCCELLA, EJ ;
BROWN, C ;
CUTLER, JA ;
HIGGINS, M ;
HORAN, MJ ;
LABARTHE, D .
HYPERTENSION, 1995, 25 (03) :305-313
[3]   BLOOD-PRESSURE, STROKE, AND CORONARY HEART-DISEASE .2. SHORT-TERM REDUCTIONS IN BLOOD-PRESSURE - OVERVIEW OF RANDOMIZED DRUG TRIALS IN THEIR EPIDEMIOLOGIC CONTEXT [J].
COLLINS, R ;
PETO, R ;
MACMAHON, S ;
HEBERT, P ;
FIEBACH, NH ;
EBERLEIN, KA ;
GODWIN, J ;
QIZILBASH, N ;
TAYLOR, JO ;
HENNEKENS, CH .
LANCET, 1990, 335 (8693) :827-838
[4]  
Cushman William C, 2002, J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), V4, P101, DOI 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2001.01481.x
[5]   EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND ATENOLOL IN PATIENTS WITH MILD-TO-MODERATE ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION [J].
DAHLOF, B ;
KELLER, SE ;
MAKRIS, L ;
GOLDBERG, AI ;
SWEET, CS ;
LIM, NY .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1995, 8 (06) :578-583
[6]   The efficacy and tolerability of losartan versus atenolol in patients with isolated systolic hypertension [J].
Farsang, C ;
Garcia-Puig, J ;
Niegowska, J ;
Baiz, AQ ;
Vrijens, F ;
Bortman, G .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2000, 18 (06) :795-801
[7]   Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of losartan alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in adult African Americans with mild to moderate hypertension [J].
Flack, JM ;
Saunders, E ;
Gradman, A ;
Kraus, WE ;
Lester, FM ;
Pratt, JH ;
Alderman, M ;
Green, S ;
Vargas, R ;
Espenshade, M ;
Ceesay, P ;
Alexander, J ;
Goldberg, A .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 23 (08) :1193-1208
[8]   Losartan potassium - A review of its pharmacology, clinical efficacy and tolerability in the management of hypertension [J].
Goa, KL ;
Wagstaff, AJ .
DRUGS, 1996, 51 (05) :820-845
[9]   A RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PARALLEL STUDY OF VARIOUS DOSES OF LOSARTAN POTASSIUM COMPARED WITH ENALAPRIL MALEATE IN PATIENTS WITH ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION [J].
GRADMAN, AH ;
ARCURI, KE ;
GOLDBERG, AI ;
IKEDA, LS ;
NELSON, EB ;
SNAVELY, DB ;
SWEET, CS .
HYPERTENSION, 1995, 25 (06) :1345-1350
[10]   Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension:: principal results of the hypertension optimal treatment (HOT) randomised trial [J].
Hansson, L ;
Zanchetti, A ;
Carruthers, SG ;
Dahlöf, B ;
Elmfeldt, D ;
Julius, S ;
Ménard, J ;
Rahn, KH ;
Wedel, H ;
Westerling, S .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9118) :1755-1762