Implementing effective fisheries-management systems - management strategy evaluation and the Australian partnership approach

被引:309
作者
Smith, ADM
Sainsbury, KJ
Stevens, RA
机构
[1] CSIRO, Div Marine Res, Marine Labs, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Australian Fisheries Management Author, Canberra, ACT 2610, Australia
关键词
fisheries-management systems; management strategy evaluation; partnership approach;
D O I
10.1006/jmsc.1999.0540
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Fisheries management is characterized by multiple and conflicting objectives, multiple stakeholders with divergent interests and high levels of uncertainty about the dynamics of the resources being managed. This conjunction of issues can result in high levels of contention and poor outcomes in the management process. Management strategy evaluation (MSE) can assist in the resolution of these issues. MSE involves assessing the consequences of a range of management options and laying bare the trade-offs in performance across a range of management objectives. Key steps in the approach involve turning broad objectives into specific and quantifiable performance indicators, identifying and incorporating key uncertainties in the evaluation, and communicating the results effectively to client groups and decision-makers. At a technical level, the framework facilitates dealing with multiple objectives and uncertainties in prediction. At the implementation level, it fails if it cannot accommodate effective stakeholder participation and acceptance. MSE shares many features with approaches such as adaptive management and development of management procedures. The principles for implementing the MSE approach are reviewed and practical aspects of its implementation under the Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) partnership model to fisheries management are discussed. The model stresses stakeholder involvement in all key areas of fisheries management, from stock assessment and setting research priorities, to enforcement and decision-making. Stakeholder involvement, including industry, science, and conservation, extends from membership of the AFMA Board, through Management Advisory Committees to Fisheries Assessment Groups. The benefits and limitations of the AFMA partnership approach are reviewed, both for MSE, and, in a wider sense, in the development of an effective fisheries management system. (C) 1999 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 979
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
*ANAO, 1996, 32 ANAO COMM FISH MA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, PHILOS T R SOC B, DOI DOI 10.1098/rstb.2004.1575
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, ELECTRON GREEN J
[4]  
*ASIC, 1998, UNPUB AUSTR SEAF IND
[5]  
Butterworth D. S., 1993, Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, V120, P83
[6]   Experiences in the evaluation and implementation of management procedures [J].
Butterworth, DS ;
Punt, AE .
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 1999, 56 (06) :985-998
[7]  
Butterworth DS, 1997, AM FISH S S, V20, P83
[8]   Management procedures in a fishery based on highly variable stocks and with conflicting objectives: Experiences in the South African pelagic fishery [J].
Cochrane, KL ;
Butterworth, DS ;
de Oliveira, JAA ;
Roel, BA .
REVIEWS IN FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES, 1998, 8 (02) :177-214
[9]  
*COMM AUSTR, 1997, MAN COMM FISH LAST F
[10]   Improvement of fishery-management advice through simulation testing of harvest algorithms [J].
Cooke, JG .
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 1999, 56 (06) :797-810