Perfusion quantification using Gaussian process deconvolution

被引:57
作者
Andersen, IK
Szymkowiak, A
Rasmussen, CE
Hanson, LG
Marstrand, JR
Larsson, HBW
Hansen, LK
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hosp, Danish Res Ctr Magnet Resonance, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[3] UCL, Gatsby Computat Neurosci Unit, London, England
[4] Univ Trondheim Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, MR Ctr, Med Sect, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
perfusion quantification; Gaussian process deconvolution; singular value decomposition; dynamic susceptibility contrast; impulse response function;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.10213
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The quantification of perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI) requires deconvolution to obtain the residual impulse response function (IRF). In this work, a method using the Gaussian process for deconvolution (GPD) is proposed. The fact that the IRF is smooth is incorporated as a constraint in the method. The GIRD method, which automatically estimates the noise level in each voxel, has the advantage that model parameters are optimized automatically. The GPD is compared to singular value decomposition (SVD) using a common threshold for the singular values, and to SVD using a threshold optimized according to the noise level in each voxel. The comparison is carried out using artificial data as well as data from healthy volunteers. It is shown that GPD is comparable to SVD with a variable optimized threshold when determining the maximum of the IRF, which is directly related to the perfusion. GPD provides a better estimate of the entire IRF. As the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) increases or the time resolution of the measurements increases, GPD is shown to be superior to SVD. This is also found for large distribution volumes.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 361
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Methodology of brain perfusion imaging [J].
Barbier, EL ;
Lamalle, L ;
Décorps, M .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 13 (04) :496-520
[2]  
Bishop C. M., 1995, NEURAL NETWORKS PATT
[3]   MR CONTRAST DUE TO INTRAVASCULAR MAGNETIC-SUSCEPTIBILITY PERTURBATIONS [J].
BOXERMAN, JL ;
HAMBERG, LM ;
ROSEN, BR ;
WEISSKOFF, RM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 34 (04) :555-566
[4]   Measuring cerebral blood flow using magnetic resonance imaging techniques [J].
Calamante, F ;
Thomas, DL ;
Pell, GS ;
Wiersma, J ;
Turner, R .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1999, 19 (07) :701-735
[5]  
Calamante F, 2000, MAGN RESON MED, V44, P466, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200009)44:3<466::AID-MRM18>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-M
[7]   Cerebral hemodynamics in CADASIL before and after acetazolamide challenge assessed with MRI bolus tracking [J].
Chabriat, H ;
Pappata, S ;
Ostergaard, L ;
Clark, CA ;
Pachot-Clouard, M ;
Vahedi, K ;
Jobert, A ;
Le Bihan, D ;
Bousser, MG .
STROKE, 2000, 31 (08) :1904-1912
[8]   Modeling the haemodynamic response in fMRI using smooth FIR filters [J].
Goutte, C ;
Nielsen, FÅ ;
Hansen, LK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 19 (12) :1188-1201
[9]  
Isaaks E. H., 1989, INTRO APPL GEOSTATIS
[10]   IN-VIVO QUANTIFICATION OF THE UNIDIRECTIONAL INFLUX CONSTANT FOR GD-DTPA DIFFUSION ACROSS THE MYOCARDIAL CAPILLARIES WITH MR-IMAGING [J].
LARSSON, HBW ;
STUBGAARD, M ;
SONDERGAARD, L ;
HENRIKSEN, O .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1994, 4 (03) :433-440