Clinical use of stereoscopic X-ray positioning of patients treated with conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer

被引:42
作者
Soete, G
Verellen, D
Michielsen, D
Vinh-Hung, V
Van de Steene, J
Van den Berge, D
De Roover, P
Keuppens, F
Storme, G
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels, Acad Hosp, Ctr Oncol, Dept Radiotherapy, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Free Univ Brussels, Acad Hosp, Dept Urol, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2002年 / 54卷 / 03期
关键词
patient positioning; conformal radiotherapy; prostate cancer;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(02)03027-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate accuracy and time requirements of a stereoscopic X-ray-based positioning system in patients receiving conformal radiotherapy to the prostate. Methods and Materials: Setup errors of the isocenter with regard to the bony pelvis were measured by means of orthogonal verification films and compared to conventional positioning (using skin drawings and lasers) and infrared marker (IR) based positioning in each of 261 treatments. In each direction, the random error represents the standard deviation and the systematic error the absolute value of the mean position. Time measurements were done in 75 treatments. Results: Random errors with the X-ray positioning system in the anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and longitudinal direction were (average +/-1 standard deviation) 2 +/- 0.6 mm, 1.7 +/- 0.6 mm, and 2.4 +/- 0.7 mm. The corresponding values of conventional as well as IR positioning were significantly higher (p < 0.01). Systematic errors for X-ray positioning were 1.1 +/- 1.2 mm AP, 0.6 +/- 0.5 mm laterally, and 1.5 +/- 1.6 mm longitudinally. Conventional and IR marker-based positioning showed significantly larger systematic errors AP and laterally, but longitudinally, the difference was not significant. Depending on the axis looked at, errors of :5 rum occurred in 2%-14% of treatments after X-ray positioning, 13%-29% using IR markers, and 28%-53% with conventional positioning. Total linac time for one treatment session was 14 min 51 s +/- 4 min 18 s, half of which was used for the X-ray-assisted positioning procedure. Conclusion: X-ray-assisted patient positioning significantly improves setup accuracy, at the cost of an increased treatment time. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:948 / 952
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   High-precision prostate cancer irradiation by clinical application of an offline patient setup verification procedure, using portal imaging [J].
Bel, A ;
Vos, PH ;
Rodrigus, PTR ;
Creutzberg, CL ;
Visser, AG ;
Stroom, JC ;
Lebesque, JV .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 35 (02) :321-332
[2]   High-precision conformal radiotherapy (HPCRT) of prostate cancer -: A new technique for exact positioning of the prostate at the time of treatment [J].
Bergström, P ;
Löfroth, PO ;
Widmark, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (02) :305-311
[3]   Estimation of the incidence of late bladder and rectum complications after high-dose (70-78 Gy) conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer, using dose-volume histograms [J].
Boersma, LJ ;
van den Brink, M ;
Bruce, AM ;
Shouman, T ;
Gras, L ;
te Velde, A ;
Lebesque, JV .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (01) :83-92
[4]   A practical method to achieve prostate gland immobilization and target verification for daily treatment [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Manola, J ;
Loffredo, M ;
Lopes, L ;
Nissen, K ;
O'Farrell, DA ;
Gordon, L ;
Tempany, CM ;
Cormack, RA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (05) :1431-1436
[5]   INTERACTIVE USE OF ONLINE PORTAL IMAGING IN PELVIC RADIATION [J].
DENEVE, W ;
VANDENHEUVEL, F ;
COGHE, M ;
VERELLEN, D ;
DEBEUKELEER, M ;
ROELSTRAETE, A ;
DEROOVER, P ;
THON, L ;
STORME, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 25 (03) :517-524
[6]  
GREENBERG ME, 1993, CONTROL MESSENGER RN, V1, P199
[7]   Optimization of conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer: Report of a dose escalation study [J].
Hanks, GE ;
Schultheiss, TE ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Hunt, M ;
Lee, WR ;
Epstein, BE ;
Coia, LR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (03) :543-550
[8]   Set-up verification using portal imaging; review of current clinical practice [J].
Hurkmans, CW ;
Remeijer, P ;
Lebesque, JV ;
Mijnheer, BJ .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 58 (02) :105-120
[9]  
*INT COMM RAD UN M, 1993, 50 ICRU INT COMM RAD
[10]   Higher than standard radiation doses (≥72 Gy) with or without androgen deprivation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer [J].
Kupelian, PA ;
Mohan, DS ;
Lyons, J ;
Klein, EA ;
Reddy, CA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (03) :567-574