Clinical studies on bone-related outcome and the effect of TNF-α blocking therapy in ankylosing spondylitis
被引:41
作者:
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Arends, Suzanne
[1
,2
]
Spoorenberg, Anneke
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
Med Ctr Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, NetherlandsUniv Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
Spoorenberg, Anneke
[1
,2
]
Brouwer, Elisabeth
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, NL-9700 AB Groningen, NetherlandsUniv Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
Brouwer, Elisabeth
[1
]
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
van der Veer, Eveline
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
Purpose of reviewTo provide an overview of clinical trials and observational studies investigating the effect of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-) blocking therapy on bone formation and bone loss in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).Recent findingsThe effect of TNF- blocking therapy on excessive bone formation or osteoproliferation remains inconclusive. Radiographic assessment of spinal osteoproliferation is complicated by the overall slow rate of progression and the high variability between individual AS patients. Multiple studies demonstrated that TNF- blocking therapy results in a significant increase in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and hip. Based on bone turnover marker (BTM) analysis, this can mainly be explained by an increase in mineralization and decrease in bone resorption.SummaryBoth osteoproliferation (e.g. syndesmophytes and ankylosis of vertebrae) and excessive bone loss resulting in osteoporosis and vertebral fractures are frequently present in AS. Previous studies showed that BMD increases during TNF- blocking therapy. Long-term follow-up in a large cohort of patients is needed to investigate whether TNF- blockers can consolidate or stop spinal osteoproliferation and prevent vertebral fractures. Future studies should focus on the effect of these agents on bone-related outcome in AS patients with early vs. advanced disease.