The acceptability of medical abortion in China, Cuba and India

被引:35
作者
Winikoff, B
Sivin, I
Coyaji, KJ
Cabezas, E
Xiao, BL
Gu, SJ
Du, MK
Krishna, UR
Eschen, A
Ellertson, C
机构
[1] AVSC INT, NEW YORK, NY USA
[2] KEM HOSP, DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL, PUNE, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA
[3] MINIST PUBL HLTH CUBA, HAVANA, CUBA
[4] NATL RES INST FAMILY PLANNING, BEIJING, PEOPLES R CHINA
[5] BEIJING MUNICIPAL RES INST FAMILY PLANNING, BEIJING, PEOPLES R CHINA
[6] SHANGHAI MED UNIV, DEPT FAMILY PLANNING, GYNECOL & OBSTET HOSP, SHANGHAI 200032, PEOPLES R CHINA
[7] LARSEN & TOUBRO MED & WELF CTR, MUMBAI, INDIA
来源
INTERNATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES | 1997年 / 23卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2950827
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
In a comparative study of the acceptability of medical abortion and surgical abortion among women in developing countries, patients at clinics in China, Cuba and India were allowed to choose between a surgical procedure and a medical regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol. The most common reasons women cited for choosing medical abortion were their desire to avoid surgery and general anesthesia; the reasons they mentioned most frequently for choosing surgical abortion were speed, simplicity and effectiveness. The failure rate for medical abortion varied from 5% in India to 16% in Cuba, while that for surgical abortion ranged from 0% in India to 4% in Cuba. Although side effects were more frequently reported by women who chose medical abortion, the majority of women at all sites were either satisfied or highly satisfied with their abortion experience, regardless of method (medical, 84-95%; surgical, 94-100%). At every site, medical abortion clients were significantly more likely than surgical clients to report being highly satisfied (China, 43% vs. 23%; Cuba, 59% vs. 39%; India, 69% vs. 54%), but also were more likely to report not being satisfied (China, 6% vs. 4%; Cuba, 17% vs. 7%; India, 5% vs. 0%). In China and India, women who had a medical abortion were significantly more likely than those who had a surgical abortion to say they would choose the same method again.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / +
页数:1
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, BMJ, V307, P532
[2]   CONDITIONS FOR CHOOSING BETWEEN DRUG-INDUCED AND SURGICAL ABORTIONS [J].
BACHELOT, A ;
CLUDY, L ;
SPIRA, A .
CONTRACEPTION, 1992, 45 (06) :547-559
[3]   TERMINATION OF EARLY HUMAN-PREGNANCY WITH RU-486 (MIFEPRISTONE) AND THE PROSTAGLANDIN ANALOG SULPROSTONE - A MULTI-CENTRE, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON BETWEEN 2 TREATMENT REGIMENS [J].
BAHZAD, C ;
WYSSLING, H ;
SARAYA, L ;
SHI, YE ;
PRASAD, RNV ;
SWAHN, ML ;
KOVACS, L ;
BELSEY, EM ;
VANLOOK, PFA .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1989, 4 (06) :718-725
[4]   PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR BLOCKAGE - EFFECT ON UTERINE CONTRACTILITY AND EARLY-PREGNANCY [J].
BYGDEMAN, M ;
SWAHN, ML .
CONTRACEPTION, 1985, 32 (01) :45-51
[5]   THERAPEUTIC-ABORTION IN EARLY-PREGNANCY WITH ANTIPROGESTOGEN RU486 ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH PROSTAGLANDIN ANALOG (GEMEPROST) [J].
CAMERON, IT ;
MICHIE, AF ;
BAIRD, DT .
CONTRACEPTION, 1986, 34 (05) :459-468
[6]   TERMINATION OF EARLY-PREGNANCY BY THE PROGESTERONE ANTAGONIST RU-486 (MIFEPRISTONE) [J].
COUZINET, B ;
LESTRAT, N ;
ULMANN, A ;
BAULIEU, EE ;
SCHAISON, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 315 (25) :1565-1570
[7]  
GAO J, 1988, CONTRACEPTION, V38, P675
[8]   A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF MIFEPRISTONE (RU486) FOR INDUCTION OF DELAYED MENSES - EFFICACY AND ACCEPTABILITY [J].
GRIMES, DA ;
MISHELL, DR ;
DAVID, HP .
CONTRACEPTION, 1992, 46 (01) :1-10
[9]   EARLY ABORTION WITH A SINGLE DOSE OF THE ANTIPROGESTIN RU-486 [J].
GRIMES, DA ;
MISHELL, DR ;
SHOUPE, D ;
LACARRA, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 158 (06) :1307-1312
[10]  
HE C, 1992, REPROD CONTRACEPTION, V3, P1