Validation of the hospital outcome prediction equation (HOPE) model for monitoring clinical performance

被引:15
作者
Duke, G. J. [1 ]
Graco, M. [2 ]
Santamaria, J. [3 ]
Shann, F. [4 ]
机构
[1] No Hosp, Crit Care Dept, Epping, Vic 3076, Australia
[2] No Clin Res Ctr, Epping, NSW, Australia
[3] St Vincent Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Royal Childrens Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
clinical indicators; hospital performance; risk adjustment; health-care outcomes; ADMINISTRATIVE DATA; RISK; INDICATORS; DEATH;
D O I
10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01676.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to validate a risk-adjusted hospital outcome prediction equation (HOPE) using a statewide administrative dataset. Methods: Retrospective observational study using multivariate logistic regression modelling. Calibration and discrimination were assessed by standardized mortality ratio (SMR), area under the receiver operating characteristic plot (ROC AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow contingency tables and goodness-of-fit statistic in an independent dataset, and in all 23 important tertiary, metropolitan and regional hospitals. The dependent variable was in-hospital death. All consecutive adult hospital separations between 1 July 2004 and 30 June 2006, excluding obstetric and day-case only admissions, from all acute health services within the State of Victoria, Australia were included. Results: A total of 379 676 consecutive records (1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005) was used to derive the HOPE model. Six variables (age, male sex, admission diagnosis, emergency admission, aged-care resident and inter-hospital transfer) were selected for inclusion in the final model. It was validated in the 384 489 consecutive records from the following year (1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006). The 95% confidence interval for the SMR was 0.98-1.02, and for the ROC AUC, 0.87-0.88. Discrimination and (one or more) calibration criteria were achieved in 22 (96%) of the 23 hospitals. Conclusion: The HOPE model is a simple risk-adjusted outcome prediction tool, based on six variables from data that are routinely collected for administrative purposes and appears to be a reliable predictor of hospital outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 289
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
*ACHS, 2007, AUSTR COUNC HEALTHC
[2]
Use of administrative data or clinical databases as predictors of risk of death in hospital: comparison of models [J].
Aylin, Paul ;
Bottle, Alex ;
Majeed, Azeem .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7602) :1044-1047
[3]
Clinical indicators in accreditation: an effective stimulus to improve patient care [J].
Collopy, BT .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 12 (03) :211-216
[4]
Methods to assess performance of models estimating risk of death in intensive care patients: A review [J].
Cook, DA .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2006, 34 (02) :164-175
[5]
*DEP HUM SERV DAT, VICT ADM EP DAT VAED
[6]
Outcome-based clinical indicators for intensive care medicine [J].
Duke, G ;
Santamaria, J ;
Shann, F ;
Stow, R .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2005, 33 (03) :303-310
[7]
Three Australian whistleblowing sagas: lessons for internal and external regulation [J].
Faunce, TA ;
Bolsin, SNC .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2004, 181 (01) :44-47
[8]
Hosmer W., 2000, Applied Logistic Regression, VSecond
[9]
*NAT CTR CLASS HLT, 2004, INT STAT CLASS DIS A
[10]
Enhancement of claims data to improve risk adjustment of hospital mortality [J].
Pine, Michael ;
Jordan, Harmon S. ;
Elixhauser, Anne ;
Fry, Donald E. ;
Hoaglin, David C. ;
Jones, Barbara ;
Meimban, Roger ;
Warner, David ;
Gonzales, Junius .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 297 (01) :71-76