Can eco-labels tune a market? Evidence from dolphin-safe labeling

被引:332
作者
Teisl, MF
Roe, B
Hicks, RL
机构
[1] Univ Maine, Dept Resource Econ & Policy, Orono, ME 04469 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Agr Environm & Dev Econ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Coll William & Mary, Dept Coastal & Ocean Policy, Williamsburg, VA 23187 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jeem.2000.1186
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper we test whether the dolphin-safe labels altered consumer purchases of tuna. We also provide a partial measure of the total welfare effects of the dolphin-safe labeling policy. The results confirm our hypothesis that the dolphin-tuna controversy and the subsequent implementation of dolphin-safe labeling affected consumer behavior. Further, the paper provide, market-based evidence that consumers can respond to eco-labels: the dolphin-safe label increased the market share of canned tuna. The welfare analysis provides a partial measure of society's willingness to pay to avoid personally contributing to dolphin mortality as a result of tuna fishing. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science (USA).
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 359
页数:21
相关论文
共 53 条