Technical quality control practices in mammography screening programs in 22 countries

被引:16
作者
Hendrick, RE
Klabunde, C
Grivegnee, A
Pou, G
Ballard-Barbash, R
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Lynn Sage Comprehens Breast Ctr, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] NCI, Appl Res Program, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Jules Bordet Canc Inst, Screening Epidemiol Clin, Brussels, Belgium
[4] BCSP, Pro Qual Salute, Montevideo, Uruguay
关键词
mammography screening; quality assurance; quality control practices;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.intqhc.a002613
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To assess current technical quality control (QC) practices within breast cancer screening or surveillance programs internationally. Materials and methods. The International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) conducted an extensive survey of quality assurance (QA) activities in developed countries known to have population-based breast cancer screening or surveillance programs in place. Twenty-three countries were sent questionnaires that included items about QA and QC requirements at screening sites, the minimum frequencies of QC test performance, and the personnel responsible for performing QC tests. Results. All 23 countries in the IBSN completed general information on their QA practices. Twenty-two countries responded with complete details on their technical QC practices. The responses indicated a pattern of consistently high-quality control practices among population-based breast cancer screening and surveillance programs. Most programs performed the great majority of QC tests. Variations were observed in the performance frequencies of QC tests and in the personnel responsible for performing QC tests. Conclusion. QC practices among population-based breast cancer screening and surveillance programs are highly evolved, with the great majority of responding countries following prescribed QC protocols. Further research is needed on appropriate performance frequencies for mammography QC tests.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 226
页数:8
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]
Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Taplin, SH ;
Yankaskas, BC ;
Ernster, VL ;
Rosenberg, RD ;
Carney, PA ;
Barlow, WE ;
Geller, BM ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Edwards, BK ;
Lynch, CF ;
Urban, N ;
Key, CR ;
Poplack, SP ;
Worden, JK ;
Kessler, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :1001-1008
[2]
DEWOLF CJM, 1993, EUROPEAN GUIDELINES
[3]
Improvement in mammography quality control: 1987-1995 [J].
Hendrick, RE ;
Chrvala, CA ;
Plott, CM ;
Cutter, GR ;
Jessop, NW ;
Wilcox-Buchalla, P .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) :663-668
[4]
HENDRICK RE, 1990, MAMMOGRAPHY QUALITY
[5]
Kopans D.B., 1993, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, vA American College of
[6]
Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: current policies, administration and guidelines [J].
Shapiro, S ;
Coleman, EA ;
Broeders, M ;
Codd, M ;
de Koning, H ;
Fracheboud, J ;
Moss, S ;
Paci, E ;
Stachenko, S ;
Ballard-Barbash, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 27 (05) :735-742
[7]
1993, FED REG 1221, V58, P67558
[8]
1993, EUR14821 CEC
[9]
1997, FED REG 1028, V62, P55852