A proper schedule of weekly paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination is highly active and very well tolerated in NSCLC patients

被引:9
作者
De Pas, Tommaso
Putzu, Carlo
Curigliano, Giuseppe
Noberasco, Cristina
Sabrina, Boselli
Catania, Chiara
Orlando, Laura
Milani, Alessandra
Spaggiari, Lorenzo
De Braud, Filippo
机构
[1] European Inst Oncol, Thorac Surg Div, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Sch Med, Milan, Italy
关键词
NSCLC; paclitaxel; gemcitabine; weekly administration;
D O I
10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.08.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background: In a previous phase I dose-escalation study, we showed a weekly administration of paclitaxel (TAX) and gemcitabine (GEM) to be active and very well tolerated in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, with the tack of interaction between drugs. The dose of GEM 1500 mg/m(2) and TAX 100 mg/m(2) was selected for phase II studies due to its predictable kinetic behaviour and less severe thrombocytopenia. Patients and methods: Fifty-four chemo-naive patients with advanced NSCLC (53 patients: stage IV) received TAX (100 mg/m(2) i.v. infusion over 1 h) followed by GEM 1500 mg/m(2) over 30 min) on days 1, 8, 15 and 21 of a 28-day cycle. Results: The objective response rate was 46% (95% CI 32-61), median OS of 10.4 ms (95% Cl 6.5-4.3), and a 1-year survival rate of 53%. Grades 3 and 4 haematological toxicity consisted of non-febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 13 and 4% of the cycles, respectively. Grade 3 non-haematological toxicities were observed in three patients (asthenia, diarrhoea and neuropathy), and were always reversible. Conclusions: This weekly schedule of TAX and GEM is highly active in chemo-naive NSCLC patients and confirms the tow toxicity profile already observed in a previous phase I study. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 364
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Phase I trial of weekly paclitaxel in advanced lung cancer [J].
Akerley, W ;
Glantz, M ;
Choy, H ;
Rege, V ;
Sambandam, S ;
Joseph, P ;
Yee, L ;
Rodrigues, B ;
Wingate, P ;
Leone, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (01) :153-158
[2]
ALBERTI W, 1995, BRIT MED J, V311, P899
[3]
A phase II study of weekly gemcitabine and paclitaxel in patients with previously untreated stage IIIb and IV non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Bhatia, S ;
Hanna, N ;
Ansari, R ;
Pletcher, W ;
Einhorn, L ;
Ng, E ;
Sandler, A .
LUNG CANCER, 2002, 38 (01) :73-77
[4]
Bunn PA, 1998, CLIN CANCER RES, V4, P1087
[5]
CHANG A, 1998, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, P17
[6]
Paclitaxel plus carboplatin, compared with paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, shows similar efficacy while more cost-effective: a randomized phase II study of combination chemotherapy against inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer previously untreated [J].
Chen, YM ;
Perng, RP ;
Lee, YC ;
Shih, JF ;
Lee, CS ;
Tsai, CM ;
Whang-Peng, J .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (01) :108-115
[7]
Cividalli A, 2000, J CANCER RES CLIN, V126, P461, DOI 10.1007/s004320050014
[8]
Phase I and pharmacologic study of weekly gemcitabine and paclitaxel in chemo-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer [J].
De Pas, T ;
de Braud, F ;
Danesi, R ;
Sessa, C ;
Catania, C ;
Curigliano, G ;
Fogli, S ;
del Tacca, M ;
Zampino, G ;
Sbanotto, A ;
Rocca, A ;
Cinieri, S ;
Marrocco, E ;
Milani, A ;
Goldhirsch, A .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2000, 11 (07) :821-827
[9]
Drug distribution and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship of paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer [J].
Fogli, S ;
Danesi, R ;
Braud, FD ;
Pas, TD ;
Curigliano, G ;
Giovannetti, E ;
Del Tacca, M .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2001, 12 (11) :1553-1559
[10]
Comparative pharmacokineties of unbound paclitaxel during 1-and 3-hour infusions [J].
Gelderblom, H ;
Mross, K ;
ten Tije, AJ ;
Behringer, D ;
Mielke, S ;
van Zomeren, DM ;
Verweij, J ;
Sparreboom, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (02) :574-581