Factors affecting adoption of hedgerows and other biodiversity-enhancing features on farms in California, USA

被引:52
作者
Brodt, Sonja [1 ]
Klonsky, Karen [1 ]
Jackson, Louise [2 ]
Brush, Stephen B. [3 ]
Smukler, Sean [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Human & Community Dev, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Grad Grp Ecol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Adoption; Innovation diffusion; Hedgerows; Farm ponds; On-farm conservation; Cost-share;
D O I
10.1007/s10457-008-9168-8
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Although hedgerows, windbreaks, and other biodiversity-enhancing farm edge features offer the potential for ecosystem benefits without occupying much crop space, relatively few farms in California, USA include such features. Our study identified the practices currently used to manage non-cropped edges of fields, ponds, and watercourses in a case study area in California. We also identified social, economic, and agronomic incentives and constraints to installing biodiversity-enhancing edge features. More than one-third of the study farmers had installed native hedgerows, windbreaks, and/or grassed edges. Interviews demonstrated the importance of socially influential farmers working in tandem with public and private agencies to build initial interest in these practices. However, these features occupied less than four percent of all possible edge length. Constraints to increasing adoption included high costs, fear of harbouring weeds and rodents, and lack of certainty about ecosystems benefits, highlighting the need for cost-share programs and more regionally-focused agroecological research.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 206
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, CENS AGR
[2]  
BECKER H, 1992, AGR RES, V40, P8
[3]   Plant-insect communities and predator-prey ratios in field margin strips, adjacent crop fields, and fallows [J].
Denys, C ;
Tscharntke, T .
OECOLOGIA, 2002, 130 (02) :315-324
[4]  
EHLER LE, 2002, FREMONTIA, V30, P59
[5]   Nitrate removal in stream riparian zones [J].
Hill, AR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1996, 25 (04) :743-755
[6]  
Kremen C., 2002, FREMONTIA, V30, P41
[7]  
Lambert D., 2006, 14 USDA EC RES SERV
[8]  
Long R. F., 1998, California Agriculture, V52, P23, DOI 10.3733/ca.v052n05p23
[9]  
Long Rachael, 2005, Grasslands, V15, P6
[10]   Assessing soil quality in a riparian buffer by testing organic matter fractions in central Iowa, USA [J].
Marquez, CO ;
Cambardella, CA ;
Isenhart, TM ;
Schultz, RC .
AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 1998, 44 (2-3) :133-140