Biofilm removal from silicone tubing: an assessment of the efficacy of dialysis machine decontamination procedures using an in vitro model

被引:53
作者
Marion-Ferey, K
Pasmore, M
Stoodley, P
Wilson, S
Husson, GP
Costerton, JW
机构
[1] Coll Pharm, Paris, France
[2] Ctr Biofilm Engn, Bozeman, MT USA
关键词
biofilm; haemodialysis; silicone tubing; endotoxins;
D O I
10.1053/jhin.2002.1320
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of 21 decontamination procedures, for the removal of a multispecies biofilm. Experiments were performed on five-day-old biofilms grown inside silicone tubing, using a reactor system that mimics a dialysis machine. The treatments were tested on 5 cm tubing samples. Effects of treatment were measured using direct microscopy following staining. Bacterial viability and endotoxin removal were determined using conventional microbiological methods following biofilm detachment by scraping. The 21 procedures were classified into four groups based on the amount of biofilm removed. The most effective treatment was an acid pre-treatment, followed by use of a concentrated bleach solution. Acid pre-treatment removes calcium and magnesium carbonate crystals that are always found in dialysis biofilms. Treatments performed at high temperature did not increase the efficacy of biofilm removal. Most treatments caused at least a 10(5)-fold reduction in bacterial viability with a few resulting in complete kill. Autoclaved and bleach-treated samples gave the best results for viability reduction, with both treatments providing an equally effective and complete kill. In addition, autoclaving led to a significant decrease in endotoxin level (removal of 99.99%). (C) 2003 The Hospital Infection Society.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 71
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Berland Y, 1995, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V10, P45
[2]   Retention of limulus amoebocyte lysate reactive bacterial products by polysulfone dialyzers is affected by the type of disinfectant [J].
Cappelli, G ;
Inguaggiato, P ;
Perrone, S ;
Gervasio, R ;
Tetta, C ;
Scialoia, MG ;
Albertazzi, A .
ASAIO JOURNAL, 1998, 44 (05) :M587-M591
[3]   Biofilms invade nephrology: Effects in hemodialysis [J].
Cappelli, G ;
Ballestri, M ;
Perrone, S ;
Ciuffreda, A ;
Inguaggiato, P ;
Albertazzi, A .
BLOOD PURIFICATION, 2000, 18 (03) :224-230
[4]   Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections [J].
Costerton, JW ;
Stewart, PS ;
Greenberg, EP .
SCIENCE, 1999, 284 (5418) :1318-1322
[5]   MICROBIAL BIOFILMS [J].
COSTERTON, JW ;
LEWANDOWSKI, Z ;
CALDWELL, DE ;
KORBER, DR ;
LAPPINSCOTT, HM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 49 :711-745
[6]  
DAWSON ME, 1988, PHARM ENG, V8, P8
[7]   DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF CHLORINE PENETRATION INTO BIOFILMS DURING DISINFECTION [J].
DEBEER, D ;
SRINIVASAN, R ;
STEWART, PS .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 60 (12) :4339-4344
[8]   The ability of direct fluorescence-based, two-colour assays to detect different physiological states of oral streptococci [J].
Decker, EM .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 33 (03) :188-192
[9]  
*EUR COUNC, 2002, EUR COUNC MON
[10]   DISINFECTION OF REGENERATED DIALYZERS WITH OZONE [J].
GAL, G ;
KISS, E ;
FOLDES, J ;
DOMBI, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 1992, 15 (08) :461-464