Whole-body PET with FDG for the diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer

被引:138
作者
De Potter, T
Flamen, P
Van Cutsem, E
Penninckx, F
Filez, L
Bormans, G
Maes, A
Mortelmans, L
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Nucl Med, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Internal Med, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Abdominal Surg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
FDG; positron emission tomography; recurrent gastric cancer; diagnosis; prognosis;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-001-0743-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This retrospective study was designed to assess the accuracy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in diagnosing recurrence of gastric cancer. Thirty-three patients who had received surgical treatment for gastric cancer with curative intent and who had subsequently undergone FDG-PET for suspected recurrence were retrieved from the PET database. All patients were reviewed with full knowledge of prior conventional diagnostic work-up. Results were compared with a gold standard, consisting of histological confirmation or radiological and clinical follow-up. The gold standard established disease recurrence in 20/33 patients (prevalence 61%,). Sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of recurrence were 70% (14/20) and 69% (9/13), respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 78% (14/18) and 60% (9/15), respectively. Of the six false-negative cases, all had intra-abdominal lesions (three had generalised abdominal metastases, one liver metastasis, one local recurrence and one ovarian metastasis). In the subgroup with previous signet cell differentiation of the primary tumour (n=13, disease prevalence 62%), sensitivity was 62% (5/8) and specificity, 60% (3/5). Survival analysis for the entire patient group using Kaplan-Meier statistics yielded a longer survival in the PET-negative group (mean +/- SD, 21.9 +/- 19.0 months) than in the PET-positive group (mean SD, 9.2 +/- 8.2 months) (P=0.01). In the patient group with proven recurrence (n=20), the mean survival for the PET-negative group was 18.5 (+/-12.5) months, as compared with 6.9 (+/-6.5) months for the PET-positive group (P=0.05). Because of its poor sensitivity and low negative predictive value, FDG-PET is not suited for screening purposes in the follow-up of treated gastric cancer. However, FDG-PET appears to provide important additional information concerning the prognosis of recurrent gastric cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 529
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] IMPROVING SURVIVAL IN GASTRIC-CANCER - REVIEW OF 5-YEAR SURVIVAL RATES IN ENGLISH-LANGUAGE PUBLICATIONS FROM 1970
    AKOH, JA
    MACINTYRE, IMC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (04) : 293 - 299
  • [2] Costa F, 1998, CANC TREAT, V98, P41
  • [3] Couper GW, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P1403
  • [4] Additional value of whole-body positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in recurrent colorectal cancer
    Flamen, P
    Stroobants, S
    Van Cutsem, E
    Dupont, P
    Bormans, G
    De Vadder, N
    Penninckx, F
    Van Hoe, L
    Mortelmans, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (03) : 894 - 901
  • [5] The utility of positron emission tomography for the diagnosis and staging of recurrent esophageal cancer
    Flamen, P
    Lerut, A
    van Custem, E
    Cambier, JP
    Maes, A
    De Wever, W
    Peeters, M
    De Leyn, P
    Van Raemdonck, D
    Mortelmans, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 120 (06) : 1085 - 1092
  • [6] MEDICAL PROGRESS - GASTRIC-CARCINOMA
    FUCHS, CS
    MAYER, RJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (01) : 32 - 41
  • [7] LYMPH-NODE METASTASES - EFFICACY OF DETECTION WITH HELICAL CT IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC-CANCER
    FUKUYA, T
    HONDA, H
    HAYASHI, T
    KANEKO, K
    TATESHI, Y
    RO, T
    MAEHARA, Y
    TANAKA, M
    TSUNEYOSHI, M
    MASUDA, K
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (03) : 705 - 711
  • [8] Randomized comparison between chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer
    Glimelius, B
    Ekstrom, K
    Hoffman, K
    Graf, W
    Sjoden, PO
    Haglund, U
    Svensson, C
    Enander, LK
    Linne, T
    Sellstrom, H
    Heuman, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 (02) : 163 - 168
  • [9] Higashi T, 1997, J NUCL MED, V38, P1337
  • [10] Kawamura T, 2001, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V92, P634, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010801)92:3<634::AID-CNCR1364>3.0.CO