Opening the black box of the relationship between HRM practices and firm performance: A comparison of MNE subsidiaries in the USA, Finland, and Russia

被引:95
作者
Fey, Carl F. [1 ,2 ]
Morgulis-Yakushev, Sergey [1 ,2 ]
Park, Hyeon Jeong [3 ]
Bjorkman, Ingmar [4 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Sch Econ, Inst Int Business, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Sch Econ Russia, St Petersburg, Russia
[3] Georgia State Univ, J Mack Robinson Coll Business, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[4] Swedish Sch Econ & Business Adm, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
strategic human resource management; firm performance; international comparison; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; MANUFACTURING PERFORMANCE; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; UNITED-STATES; COMPENSATION; BUSINESS; CULTURE; SYSTEMS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1057/jibs.2008.83
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the extent to which different human resource management (HRM) practices work better in different countries. We also try to open the black box between HRM and multinational enterprise (MNE) subsidiary performance by considering mechanisms through which HRM practices affect MNE subsidiary performance. The study utilizes a unique data set consisting of subsidiaries of 241 MNEs operating in Russia, USA, and Finland. In the partial least-square analysis used to examine our hypotheses, we demonstrate that different HRM practices are preferable in different countries, and that motivation and ability are important mediating variables in the HRM-MNE subsidiary performance relationship.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 712
页数:23
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1959, TALENT AND SOC
[2]  
[Anonymous], HUMAN RESOURCE MANAG
[3]  
ARTHUR JB, 1994, ACAD MANAGE J, V37, P670, DOI 10.5465/256705
[4]  
Bae J., 1998, International Journal of Human Resource Management, V9, P653
[5]   COMPENSATION AND INCENTIVES - PRACTICE VS THEORY [J].
BAKER, GP ;
JENSEN, MC ;
MURPHY, KJ .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1988, 43 (03) :593-616
[6]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[7]  
Barney JB, 1998, HUM RESOURCE MANAGE, V37, P31, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199821)37:1<31::AID-HRM4>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-W
[9]   AUTONOMY AS A MODERATOR OF THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (01) :111-118
[10]  
Becker BE, 1998, RES PERS H, V16, P53