A clinical monitoring form for mood disorders

被引:126
作者
Sachs, GS [1 ]
Guille, C [1 ]
McMurrich, SL [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Harvard Bipolar Res Program, Clin Psychopharmacol Unit, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
formal rating scales; mood disorders;
D O I
10.1034/j.1399-5618.2002.01195.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The Clinical Monitoring Form (CMF) for mood disorders was developed as a time efficient record keeping tool for routine clinical use. This report presents preliminary data evaluating the correlation between the CMF's dimensional subscales for depression and mood elevation and formal mood rating scales across a wide spectrum of mood states. Methods: To harvest data for 500 follow-up visits required collection of data from consecutive records accumulated during the conduct of seven double blind clinical trials involving a total of 58 participants. These trials utilized the CMF as a source document in conjunction with formal study outcome scales, e.g. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Mania Rating Scale (MRS) from the Schedule of Affective Disorders-Current (SUM-C). Correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the relationship between the formal rating scales, Clinical Global Impression and the depression (SUM-D) and mood elevation (SUM-ME) subscales of the CMF. Results: Robust correlations were observed between SUM-D and the formal depression scales, HRSD and MADRS, r=0.79, r=0.88, respectively. Similar robust correlations were also found between the SUM-ME and the formal mood elevation scales, YMRS and the MRS, r=0.84, r=0.86, respectively. Conclusion: The CMF appears to offer a reasonable alternative to the formal rating scales typically used in research studies.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 327
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STRUCTURED CLIN INTE
[2]  
ENDICOTT J, 1976, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V33, P766
[3]  
FIEVE RR, 1986, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V47, P560
[4]  
Guy W., 1976, Guy, W. (1976). ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology-Revised. Rockville, MD, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, NIMH Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs, DHEW Publ No ADM 76-338, pp 218-222., P218
[5]   A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION [J].
HAMILTON, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1960, 23 (01) :56-62
[6]  
JOHNSON MH, 1986, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V4, P546
[7]   NEW DEPRESSION SCALE DESIGNED TO BE SENSITIVE TO CHANGE [J].
MONTGOMERY, SA ;
ASBERG, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1979, 134 (APR) :382-389
[8]   DEPRESSIVE-ILLNESS AND PLACEBO-RESPONSE [J].
SATO, TL ;
TURNBULL, CD ;
DAVIDSON, JRT .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN MEDICINE, 1984, 14 (03) :171-179
[9]   Modification of the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale for use in bipolar illness (BP): the CGI-BP [J].
Spearing, MK ;
Post, RM ;
Leverich, GS ;
Brandt, D ;
Nolen, W .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1997, 73 (03) :159-171
[10]   RATING-SCALE FOR MANIA - RELIABILITY, VALIDITY AND SENSITIVITY [J].
YOUNG, RC ;
BIGGS, JT ;
ZIEGLER, VE ;
MEYER, DA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1978, 133 (NOV) :429-435