Causes of failure and life expectancy of the ileoanal pouch

被引:91
作者
Korsgen, S [1 ]
Keighley, MRB [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV BIRMINGHAM,QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSP,DEPT SURG,BIRMINGHAM B15 2TH,W MIDLANDS,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s003840050069
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
180 ileoanal pouches constructed over 10 years and followed for at least 2 years (154 for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and 26 for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP)) were reviewed. 23 pouches have been excised to date, 8 remain defunctioned (pouch failure FAP 7.7%, IBD 18.8%). The reasons for excision were: ischemia (n = 6), pelvic sepsis (n = 5), severe stenosis (n = 3), underlying Crohn's disease (n = 3), poor function (n = 5) and fistula (n = 1). The reasons for defunction were: Crohn's disease (n = 1), pelvic sepsis (n = 5) and ileoanal stenosis (n = 2). The projected overall pouch survival rate (Life table analysis) at 5 years was 81% (confidence interval 74-87%. Beyond 7 years, the figures to calculate survival became unreliable (small numbers). There was a significant association between pouch failure and pelvic sepsis (Fisher's exact test P < 0.0001) and between failure and fistula formation (P < 0.02). Multiple regression analysis showed pelvic sepsis and recurrent pouchitis to be independent factors of pouch failure. Pouch failure can occur many years after initial operation. Long-term follow up is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 8
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   CURRENT SURGICAL THERAPY FOR MUCOSAL ULCERATIVE-COLITIS [J].
BINDEROW, SR ;
WEXNER, SD .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1994, 37 (06) :610-624
[2]   CONTINUING EVOLUTION OF THE PELVIC POUCH PROCEDURE [J].
COHEN, Z ;
MCLEOD, RS ;
STEPHEN, W ;
STERN, HS ;
OCONNOR, B ;
REZNICK, R .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1992, 216 (04) :506-512
[3]   ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSES COMPLICATIONS AND FUNCTION IN 1005 PATIENTS [J].
FAZIO, VW ;
ZIV, Y ;
CHURCH, JM ;
OAKLEY, JR ;
LAVERY, IC ;
MILSOM, JW ;
SCHROEDER, TK .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (02) :120-127
[4]   ILEAL POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS - REOPERATION FOR POUCH-RELATED COMPLICATIONS [J].
GALANDIUK, S ;
SCOTT, NA ;
DOZOIS, RR ;
KELLY, KA ;
ILSTRUP, DM ;
BEART, RW ;
WOLFF, BG ;
PEMBERTON, JH ;
NIVATVONGS, S ;
DEVINE, RM .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1990, 212 (04) :446-454
[5]  
GEMLO BT, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P784
[6]   RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF LOOP ILEOSTOMY IN RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY [J].
GROBLER, SP ;
HOSIE, KB ;
KEIGHLEY, MRB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (09) :903-906
[7]  
JARVINEN HJ, 1993, ANN CHIR GYNAECOL FE, V82, P159
[8]   AN AUDIT OF RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY [J].
KEIGHLEY, MRB ;
GROBLER, S ;
BAIN, I .
GUT, 1993, 34 (05) :680-684
[9]  
MARCELLO PW, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P500
[10]   THE CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AFTER RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY IN 100 PATIENTS [J].
ORESLAND, T ;
FASTH, S ;
NORDGREN, S ;
HULTEN, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1989, 4 (01) :50-56