Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation

被引:116
作者
Weijer, C [1 ]
Goldsand, G
Emanuel, EJ
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Bioeth, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Joint Ctr Bioeth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] NIH, Dept Clin Bioeth, Warren G Magnuson Clin Ctr, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1038/15455
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
As genetic research increasingly focuses on communities, there have been calls for extending research protections to them. We critically examine guidelines developed to protect aboriginal communities and consider their applicability to other communities. These guidelines are based on a model of researcher-community partnership and span the phases of a research project, from protocol development to publication. The complete list of 23 protections may apply to those few non-aboriginal communities, such as the Amish, that are highly cohesive. Although some protections may be applicable to less-cohesive communities, such as Ashkenazi Jews, analysis suggests substantial problems in extending these guidelines in tote beyond the aboriginal communities for which they were developed.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 280
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] *AB HLTH RES ETH C, 1989, IN B
  • [2] *AB HLTH RES ETH C, 1998, ETH CONS HLTH REL RE
  • [3] American Anthropological Association, 1997, COD ETH
  • [4] American Indian Law Center, 1994, MOD TRIB RES COD
  • [5] American Public Health Association, 1984, NAT ARCT HLTH SCI PO
  • [6] [Anonymous], COD COND RES INV HUM
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1986, ETHICS REGULATION CL
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1998, TRIC POL STAT ETH CO
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1991, INT GUID ETH REV EP
  • [10] APPELBAUM PS, 1987, INFORMED CONSENT LEG