The gambling related cognitions scale (GRCS): development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties

被引:384
作者
Raylu, N [1 ]
Oei, TPS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
cognition; community; confirmatory factor analyses; gambling; problem gamblers;
D O I
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00753.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims The aims of this study are to develop and validate a measure to screen for a range of gambling-related cognitions (GRC) in gamblers. Design and participants A total of 968 volunteers were recruited from a community-based population. They were divided randomly into two groups. Principal axis factoring with varimax rotation was performed on group one and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used on group two to confirm the best-fitted solution. Measurements The Gambling Related Cognition Scale (GRCS) was developed for this study and the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), the Motivation Towards Gambling Scale (MTGS) and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-2 1) were used for validation. Findings Exploratory factor analysis performed using half the sample indicated five factors, which included interpretative control/bias (GRCS-IB), illusion of control (GRCS-IC), predictive control (GRCS-PC), gambling-related expectancies (GRCS-GE) and a perceived inability to stop gambling (GRCS-IS). These accounted for 70% of the total variance. Using the other half of the sample, CFA confirmed that the five-factor solution fitted the data most effectively. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the factors ranged from 0.77 to 0.91, and 0.93 for the overall scale. Conclusions This paper demonstrated that the 23-item GRCS has good psychometric properties and thus is a useful instrument for identifying GRC among non-clinical gamblers. It provides the first step towards devising/adapting similar tools for problem gamblers as well as developing more specialized instruments to assess particular domains of GRC.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 769
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
American Psychological Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.744053, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596.744053, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
[2]   Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample [J].
Antony, MM ;
Bieling, PJ ;
Cox, BJ ;
Enns, MW ;
Swinson, RP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1998, 10 (02) :176-181
[3]   TO DRINK OR NOT TO DRINK - THE DIFFERENTIAL ROLE OF ALCOHOL EXPECTANCIES AND DRINKING REFUSAL SELF-EFFICACY IN QUANTITY AND FREQUENCY OF ALCOHOL-CONSUMPTION [J].
BALDWIN, AR ;
OEI, TPS ;
YOUNG, R .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 1993, 17 (06) :511-530
[4]  
Beck A.T., 1993, COGNITIVE THERAPY SU
[5]  
Bentler P. M., 2006, EQS 6 structural equations program manual
[6]   Clinical features and psychiatric comorbidity of subjects with pathological gambling behavior [J].
Black, DW ;
Moyer, T .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 1998, 49 (11) :1434-1439
[7]  
BLASZCZYNSKI A, 1994, PSYCHIAT PSYCHOL LAW, V1, P129, DOI DOI 10.1080/13218719409524836
[8]  
Chantal Y., 1994, Society and Leisure, V17, P189, DOI DOI 10.1080/07053436.1994.10715471
[9]  
Coulombe A, 1992, J Gambl Stud, V8, P235, DOI 10.1007/BF01014651
[10]  
DeVellis R., 2017, SCALE DEV THEORY APP