Comparison of DNA and RNA quantification methods suitable for parameter estimation in metabolic modeling of microorganisms

被引:29
作者
De Mey, Marjan [1 ]
Lequeux, Gaspard
Maertens, Jo
De Maeseneire, Sofie
Soetaert, Wim
Vandamme, Erick
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Fac Biosci Engn, Lab Ind Microbiol & Biocatalysis, Dept Biochem & Microbial Technol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, BIOMATH, Dept Appl Math Biometr & Proc Control, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
nucleic acid quantification; spectroscopy; fluoroscopy; metabolic modeling;
D O I
10.1016/j.ab.2006.02.014
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Recent developments in cellular and molecular biology require the accurate quantification of DNA and RNA in large numbers of samples at a sensitivity that enables determination on small quantities. In this study, five current methods for nucleic acid quantification were compared: (i) UV absorbance spectroscopy at 260 nm, (ii) colorimetrie reaction with orcinol reagent, (iii) colorimetric reaction based on diphenylamine, (iv) fluorescence detection with Hoechst 33258 reagent, and (v) fluorescence detection with thiazole orange reagent. Genomic DNA of three different microbial species (with widely different G+C content) was used, as were two different types of yeast RNA and a mixture of equal quantities of DNA and RNA. We can conclude that for nucleic acid quantification, a standard curve with DNA of the microbial strain under study is the best reference. Fluorescence detection with Hoechst 33258 reagent is a sensitive and precise method for DNA quantification if the G + C content is less than 50%. In addition, this method allows quantification of very low levels of DNA (nanogram scale). Moreover, the samples can be crude cell extracts. Also, UV absorbance at 260 rim and fluorescence detection with thiazole orange reagent are sensitive methods for nucleic acid detection, but only if purified nucleic acids need to be measured. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 203
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Tuning genetic control through promoter engineering [J].
Alper, H ;
Fischer, C ;
Nevoigt, E ;
Stephanopoulos, G .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (36) :12678-12683
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, The r project for statistical computing
[3]   Effects of humic substances on fluorometric DNA quantification and DNA hybridization [J].
Bachoon, DS ;
Otero, E ;
Hodson, RE .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2001, 47 (01) :73-82
[4]   TOWARD A SCIENCE OF METABOLIC ENGINEERING [J].
BAILEY, JE .
SCIENCE, 1991, 252 (5013) :1668-1675
[5]  
Bailey JE, 1996, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V52, P109, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19961005)52:1<109::AID-BIT11>3.3.CO
[6]  
2-1
[7]   NEW DOUBLE-STAINING TECHNIQUE FOR RNA AND DNA MEASUREMENT IN MARINE-PHYTOPLANKTON [J].
BERDALET, E ;
DORTCH, Q .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1991, 73 (2-3) :295-305
[8]  
BREMER H, 1996, ESCHERICHIA CLI SALM
[9]  
BRUCKNER J, 1955, BIOCHEM J, V60, P200
[10]  
Burton K., 1977, CURR CONTENTS, V26, P315